Deer In The Headlights Look

[MD Longhorn]

Convoluted as it may seem (and we've had this conversation here before), it is possible for a runner to not pass, yet score ahead of the preceding runner - and not break any rules. Logic says the runs must score in order, but the rulebook doesn't. If R1 is standing right by the plate, R2 touches, then R1 touches, you don't have any grounds for removing a run or calling an out.

[CT1]

Call R1 out and end the inning. Yes, you're gonna have a big argument, but the offense screwed up by wanting to be too quick to celebrate.

You have a chance to do some preventive officiating in these situations by telling the offense "Stay back & let 'em touch." This will be a subtle reminder to the runners to touch home before starting the high-fives.

[Manny A]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

Convoluted as it may seem (and we've had this conversation here before), it is possible for a runner to not pass, yet score ahead of the preceding runner - and not break any rules. Logic says the runs must score in order, but the rulebook doesn't. If R1 is standing right by the plate, R2 touches, then R1 touches, you don't have any grounds for removing a run or calling an out.

I remember that discussion. But if this were to happen in my game, I'm not going to visually measure the distance between R1 and home plate, and then extrapolate that since R2 probably touched home while his trailing edge was still superimposed on R1's leading edge, R2 still did not meet the strictest definition of "passing". Why cut R1 some slack when it's clear he gave up his baserunning responsibilities?

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by Manny A

I remember that discussion. But if this were to happen in my game, I'm not going to visually measure the distance between R1 and home plate, and then extrapolate that since R2 probably touched home while his trailing edge was still superimposed on R1's leading edge, R2 still did not meet the strictest definition of "passing". Why cut R1 some slack when it's clear he gave up his baserunning responsibilities?

You're not cutting anyone anything. Passing is a call you do not make unless you're POSITIVE R2 passed R1. The benefit of the doubt goes the opposite direction that you're giving it. You're not measuring, extrapolating, superimposing to try to excuse a possible pass... you're only calling him out for passing if you are absolutely sure that he did so.

[Manny A]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

You're not cutting anyone anything. Passing is a call you do not make unless you're POSITIVE R2 passed R1. The benefit of the doubt goes the opposite direction that you're giving it. You're not measuring, extrapolating, superimposing to try to excuse a possible pass... you're only calling him out for passing if you are absolutely sure that he did so.

And in order to be absolutely sure, you will have to measure, extrapolate and superimpose.

Sorry, but I cannot for the life of me justify not making that call if R1 stops short of the plate to high-five trail runners, no matter how close he remains to the plate, and the trail runners go on by.

You're right, it's not in the rule book. But I just find it hard to believe that the rule makers would not consider a runner who touches home after a previous runner stops short of it as a form of passing.

Using your argument, R2 could be completely in front of R1, with the exception of his pinky finger of his trailing hand being intertwined with R1's pinky finger of his leading hand, and not have passed him. Even though R2's torso is almost six feet ahead of R1's torso, you would say R2 isn't out yet.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by Manny A

Using your argument, R2 could be completely in front of R1, with the exception of his pinky finger of his trailing hand being intertwined with R1's pinky finger of his leading hand, and not have passed him. Even though R2's torso is almost six feet ahead of R1's torso, you would say R2 isn't out yet.

I'm not making an argument. I'm explaining the rule.

And given that not that long ago was a caseplay where BR was rounding first and R1 was holding to see if it was caught - and as BR was about to pass, R1 grabbed BR's hand and spun BR in front of, past him, and back behind him - and the ruling was not out... I guess to your pinkie intertwined TWP - that guy's not out either.

Plus the play where R2 from first and R1 from second are coming home with R1 on R2's heels - R2 slides between R1's legs and touches home just before R1 - also not passing and both runs count...

As to extrapolating, blah blah blah. If you are not in position to clearly see daylight between the two runners, then they did not pass. If you have to guess, they did not pass. And the moment you say torso in the argument, you've lost the protest.