![]() |
Illegal pitch? Ball awarded?
FED rules. Bases empty. Full count on the batter. Pitcher begins his wind-up catches his spikes on the rubber during his rocker step and stops. He does not deliver to the batter.
Illegal pitch? Ball four? Typically, nobody calls this an illegal pitch with no runners on base. I don't. But, I'm wondering if the FED powers-that-be expect us to call this an "illegal pitch" and award the batter a ball. Opinions? |
By rule, an IP and a ball in FED.
|
Lol!
Just for historical note:
When Brad Rumble was the Editor of the Rule book (Brad's Book) . . . this exactly violation was called a "Balk" for 15 years. Tee |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Penalty (ART. 1,2,3): |
Quote:
Since there was not a thrown ball that crossed a foul line shouldn't it be called a no pitch? This is what a clinician from our state told me when I asked him the question. "No pitch. It can’t be a ball since the pitch (that didn’t happen) didn’t cross a foul line. This happens quite frequently (relatively speaking) at the Major League level. No big deal. Just start over. Who was harmed by it? Nobody…" |
Quote:
|
The reason I asked the question (OP), is because I have always known, technically, that the batter is awarded a ball (the penalty for an illegal pitch with no runners on base) but no umpire in our area makes this call; nor do the coaches expect it to be made. I guess it's kind of a regional thing. I was wondering if that was also the case in other parts of the country.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
:D Here in South-West Ohio, I've called this about 3 time in 25 yrs of high school umpiring.:p
|
Quote:
I'd have to say that this happens to me, at a minimum, once per year. Sometimes more frequently. My experience is that it's not all that rare. |
:p I'm saying that there are a lot of reasons for an aborted pitch, but I've only seen it three times where it was callable.
I've seen times when the pitcher falls or gets to dance with bees or something like that. I've seen dust swirls that cause the pitcher to stop. I've always treated these instances as "do-overs".:eek: |
Quote:
|
If all the participants are willing to accept a "do-over" as the correct result, who am I to say differently?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26pm. |