The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 05, 2003, 05:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NeverNeverLand
Posts: 1,037
Can't remember who it was playin. Happened few days ago MLB.

Man on third, Pitcher from the wind up, Runner stealing home. Catcher comes out from behind the plate through the strike zone and catches pitch before it crosses the plate and the batter has chance to swing. Catcher tags runner out by three steps. Runner called out by PU.

A similar situation was mentioned on another thread, but I can't find it. I did find tho, a ruling under OBR.

(b) Defensive interference is an act by a fielder which hinders or prevents a batter from hitting a pitch.

So, in the above situation, shouldn't that have been catcher's interference?






Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 05, 2003, 09:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,474
Thumbs up You are correct Sir!

OBR 7.07
If with a runner on 3rd base and trying to score by means of a squeeze play or a steal, the catcher or any other fielder steps on, or in front of home base wihtout possession of the ball, or touches the batter or his bat, the pitcher shall be charged with a balk, the batter shall be awarded first base on the interference and the ball is dead.

If it happened the way you have explained... somebody screwed up.
__________________
"There are no superstar calls. We don't root for certain teams. We don't cheat. But sometimes we just miss calls." - Joe Crawford
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 05, 2003, 12:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 744
It was the Twins and Tigers, Cristian Guzman was thrown out at home. Unfortunately, I was visiting ballparks in Cleveland and Cincinnati last week, and only saw this play on a replay once.

If the pitcher steps off the rubber before throwing the ball home, the catcher's play is legal. If it is a pitch, the catcher's play is illegal.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 05, 2003, 01:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
J/R says if the batter backs off the plate - then there is no CI.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 05, 2003, 10:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 220
Send a message via AIM to Ump20
Batter Gives Up

Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Ives
J/R says if the batter backs off the plate - then there is no CI.
Interesting point. Jaska Roder says it is NOT CI if the batter "completely gives up his opportunity to swing or bunt at a pitch". I remember a number of years ago when former Mets catcher Mike Fitsgerald was with the Expos and he was called for CI on a similar play and stated he was unaware the rule existed about the catcher coming across the plate to catch a pitch on a squeeze / steal of home. Jim/NYC
__________________
A friend is someone who knows the song in your heart, and can sing it back to you when you have forgotten the words. - Donna Robert
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 06, 2003, 05:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 994
Re: Batter Gives Up

Quote:
Originally posted by Ump20
... stated he was unaware the rule existed...
I don't know if he is still playing or not, but it definitely sounds like he is cut out for a career as a coach.
__________________
Dan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1