The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 04, 2003, 04:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,474
Wink Answer me this

How serious do you get about requiring the batter's compliance with

"If he makes no effort to avoid being hit..." FED 8-1-1d, exception.

"Batter makes no attempt to avoid being touched by the ball..." OBR 6.08 (B)(2)?

I tend to feel there is an area within approximately a foot of the plate that belongs to the pitcher. In that area the batter definitely must make effort to not get hit. However, I also feel that there is an area well away from the plate that belongs to the batter and that the batter could stand in that area and reasonably expect to not get hit.

A batter that gets hit in the half of the batter's box that is away from the plate and that has made no physical movement gets first base in my games. The pitcher has invaded his area. Perhaps the batter's only effort was to overcome the urge to jump out of the box and by staying in the box has shown his confidence that the pitcher's delivery is going to break over the plate.

By the book, I feel wrong in this. But in the spirit of the game, I feel awarding first for an out of control pitch is something I necessarily need to do.

Who has thoughts on this?
__________________
"There are no superstar calls. We don't root for certain teams. We don't cheat. But sometimes we just miss calls." - Joe Crawford
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1