The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 15, 2013, 03:02pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Lame.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 15, 2013, 03:13pm
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
I'm just curious as to how much it will slow the game down.....even further.

Blown calls that would have been overturned http://ftw.usatoday.com/2013/08/7-bl...nstant-replay/
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.

Last edited by grunewar; Thu Aug 15, 2013 at 03:25pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 15, 2013, 04:41pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by grunewar View Post
I'm just curious as to how much it will slow the game down.....even further.

Blown calls that would have been overturned 7 blown calls that would have been overturned by MLB instant replay | For The Win
And 3 of the 7 wouldn't have been overturned -- typical idiocy by McPaper.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 17, 2013, 08:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
And 3 of the 7 wouldn't have been overturned -- typical idiocy by McPaper.
That's what I was thinking - everyone just wants a "perfect world" and it won't ever happen.

Thanks
David
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 17, 2013, 09:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
7 freaking calls over a 40 yr. time span, has someone's panties in a frenzy? And it's only someone's "OPINION", (and we know what those are synonymous with), that they were blown calls.

Get a life.

Listen, bottom line here is that if your going to loose sleep about whether someone is going to try and overrule your decisions on the field whether by picture, replay, verbal abuse or any other means, then maybe you need a little thicker skin to do this job. Over thousands of games that I have officiated in two sports, I find it nearly impossible to count on two fingers the number of games where everyone has agreed with every one of my calls.

I still sleep soundly, each and every night. (with the exception of the nights I pig out out on the delicious Mexican food)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 18, 2013, 09:27am
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by jicecone View Post
7 freaking calls over a 40 yr. time span, has someone's panties in a frenzy?
Well, you know there were probably 7 calls over the last 40 days that would get overturned by the new replay system. These so-called expert journalists just felt 7 critical calls made during post-season play were worthy of mentioning in their argument.

The problem is, not all 7 deserved mentioning, and they probably left out a few others that were more applicable. Just off the top of my head, I recall the gross phantom tag by Chuck Knoblauch against Jose Offermann in the 1999 ALCS that would get an overturn.

The Armbrister/Fisk collision? Hell no. In fact, there's a rule that covers that.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 18, 2013, 09:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
And then to top the week off I sat and watched a portion of the NYY vs Red Sox game yesterday until I had to shut it down because of this horrible announcer whose first name is Tim.

What an idiot he is. You just can't fix Stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 15, 2013, 04:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,118
Haven't seen the Carlton Fisk/Ed Armbrister play in a long time.

Thoughts:

1) Maybe when you have a ball in your hand you should tag the dude when you bump into him.

2) Darrell Johnson must not ever cuss. "Lousy Operation" is a pretty funny comment.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 15, 2013, 04:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
You know, I recall this same resistance from football officials when they first fixed their game by adding replay.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 15, 2013, 05:17pm
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
ESPN's PTI discussed how it may be better to have these challenges at "baseball central" so MLB could call what to challenge in the game, vice "coaches challenges." Rationale being, what happens if you're OUT of challenges and there's a controversial play in the 13th inning?

They also mentioned how this might "quicken" the game as managers wouldn't "waste so much time" arguing calls. That was interesting.
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 15, 2013, 05:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 158
A couple of questions:

1) Bottom of sixth, two out, close play at first, runner ruled out to end of inning, right after the opposing pitcher throws his eight pitches, the manager comes out and challenges the call saying he was safe. Is the challenge allowed, when is the cut off point where challenges aren't allowed?

2) What is the standard for overruling a call. When a call that should be overturned isn't, who in the Commissioner's Office will take the blame?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 15, 2013, 05:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
I like this article's take on it.

Why not have a 5th umpiring crew member at each ballpark be responsible for replay review in an expanded format? Makes better sense than the new, proposed policy.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 15, 2013, 10:19pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
You know, I recall this same resistance from football officials when they first fixed their game by adding replay.
I'm not a fan of replay in football, either. I know that puts me in the minority. Football is not baseball. Baseball already is struggling with pace of play, I really worry what this could do.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Instant replay--maybe. Jurassic Referee Baseball 28 Thu Nov 08, 2007 04:50pm
Instant Replay? SRW Softball 12 Fri Nov 17, 2006 03:07pm
Instant Replay in the CFL ref18 Football 1 Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:27pm
Instant Replay??? IREFU2 Basketball 4 Mon Mar 14, 2005 04:20pm
Big Ten Instant Replay. JRutledge Football 19 Thu Sep 02, 2004 07:49pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1