|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Yes, but that doesn't exonerate them from possible RL violations. That's why the BR only needs to be within the lane over the last half, to give him ample opportunity to get within the lane.
__________________
Tony Carilli |
|
|||
Thanks guys for setting me straight on this! Personally, I think the rule is for the better now than it was before because 9x out of 10, the B/R is INTENTIONALLY running inside the foul line to make it more difficult for the defense anyways.
|
|
|||
With due respect to Jim (and he's due a LOT), I've inferred over the last 3-5 years that the rules committees at the highest levels of amateur and professional baseball, while finding his opinions worth considering, don't hold them in the same regard as "internet umpires" and his paying customers do, and certainly don't think he has the final word on anything.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Twins @ Tigers - interference call | Dakota | Baseball | 52 | Fri Sep 28, 2012 08:43am |
Interference BR - Base on Balls | JPaco54 | Baseball | 7 | Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:34am |
Interference at 2nd Base | Stripes33 | Softball | 6 | Tue May 13, 2008 10:10am |
3rd base coach interference | tchaap | Softball | 3 | Sun Jun 06, 2004 07:28pm |
Interference at first base | RustyWinslow | Baseball | 14 | Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:01am |