Miami / St.Louis.....not a force at third

[Matt]

Originally Posted by bluehair

If you get that technical about a tag at any level (and especially HS or above) you will rightly be considered an OOO.

That's funny, since that's all I do. If I called a ball outside of the mitt a tag, I'd be reamed.

[tcarilli]

Originally Posted by Matt

That's funny, since that's all I do. If I called a ball outside of the mitt a tag, I'd be reamed.

Do you really think so? Imagine a similar instance where the player has the ball in his bare hand and his bare-hand is up against the glove, say F4 as R1 approaches him on a ground ball. F4 reaches out with both hands his glove closed and the ball up against the glove and touches the runner without breaking the contact between the ball and the glove. Who here honestly thinks that a tag of this nature would bring down the house?

Further suppose instead of having the ball touching the glove, instead F4 has the ball touching the glove but the glove is not closed around the bare hand (so that if the bare hand was not in the glove the ball would fall out of the glove) who here would rule that R1 had not been tagged because the glove was not closed around the hand that was firmly and securely holding the ball? If yes in this scenario and no in the previous scenario, why?

I don't see how in each of these scenarios the spirit and intent of the rule has been violated.

[CT1]

Originally Posted by Matt

That's funny, since that's all I do. If I called a ball outside of the mitt a tag, I'd be reamed.

Only by a young or inexperienced coach. Most coaches know that's an out, and expect to get the same call when their team is on defense.