![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
The DDB signal is still used in softball. I had a situation earlier this season where, as PU, I saw R2 get obstructed by F5 on a two-out fly ball down the leftfield line. I put out my left hand (while holding my mask) to make the DDB Obstruction call. R2 saw it, and thought I was signalling foul, so she held up and started to go back to second base. The ball was fair, her base coach yelled for her to go home, and she got confused. She ended up going back to third base safely. I didn't award her home, which she might've attained if she would have continued.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
Quote:
If you thought she would have achieved home had she run after seeing your signal, then I'm assuming you would have thought she would have achieved home had she run BEFORE seeing it. Our duty as umpire is to decide, AT THE MOMENT OF OBS, where the runner would have gotten to. All of the stuff that happened after the OBS is irrelevant (not so in all baseball codes ... but you're not talking baseball). At the moment of OBS, would she have achieved home had the OBS not happened. From your description that she could have even if she'd headed home AFTER going the wrong way for a second, I'd say that's a resounding yes.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Had there been no obstruction there would have been no signal.
If there was no signal she would not have been confused and stopped. The stop was therefore because of the obstruction.
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
No, I really don't. To what do you refer?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Our duty as umpire is to nullify the act of obstruction. We can't always do that as soon as the OBS occurs.
PLAY: R2 is obstructed by F6 between 2nd and 3rd on a base hit by B2. He is then thrown out at the plate: (a) by 10 feet (b) on a close play We can't know at the moment of obstruction what our award will be -- 3rd or home. |
|
|||
Just my imagination...running away with me
Quote:
1) Pick any of the interference/obstruction threads from this site where a slight variation in the sitch reverses the call, then picture the umpire pointing (I've got something). One team thinks its interference (out) the other team thinks its obstruction and then the umpire raising his left arm/fist...possible confusion. 2) Pick any of the interference/obstruction threads from this site where a slight variation in the sitch reverses the call, then picture the umpire pointing (I've got something). One team thinks its interference (out) the other team thinks its obstruction and then the umpire gets excited and raises the wrong arm raising his right arm/fist...possible confusion...imagine that. And then you give another example of how a DDB mechanic was confused with a foul mechanic. Even with your description, I can't begin to imagine how that happened. ![]() I'm glad to see the Fed DDB mechanic gone. Last edited by bluehair; Mon May 13, 2013 at 11:10am. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() If the mechanics are done properly, however, I still don't see how they can be confused. One has the entire left arm completely horizontal. The other has the right arm bent at a 90-degree angle. Shame on the players and coaches that can't figure out the difference. Besides, it's not our job to ensure our properly-executed signals don't confuse players and coaches. Quote:
My guess, however, as to why FED got rid of it is so that baseball umpires are consistent in all codes.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me? |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Obstruction | jmkupka | Softball | 11 | Tue Jun 30, 2009 09:01am |
Obstruction? | tjones1 | Baseball | 13 | Sun Jun 14, 2009 05:35pm |
ASA obstruction | David Emerling | Softball | 10 | Thu May 03, 2007 05:38pm |
Obstruction at First | Cubbies87 | Baseball | 9 | Sun Sep 28, 2003 07:53pm |
Obstruction | finfan | Softball | 2 | Thu Apr 17, 2003 08:33pm |