![]() |
|
|||
[QUOTE]
Quote:
Apparently it is not clearly defined with respect to type of video equipment to be used. Why use a neutral site (reference Tee's post)? makes sense and is the most cost effective. The alternative would be to have each stadium equipped with similar video equipment plus have a replay booth manned by former MLB umpires which would cost money. Yeah I know baseball is big business but how many questionable HR's do you get a year. There is already (again refer to Tee's post) a neutral site in NY with all camera angles you need. The people in this neutral site are not making calls or rulings but simply giving the umpires all angles needed to make the final call. Bottom Line: MLB (where's Bud been but that's another topic altogether) needs to clearly define Replay with respect to video equipment. Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/94976-incorrect-call-replay-review-cleveland.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
FARK.com: (7744061) So, why do MLB umpires view replays on a 19" Sharp Aquos monitor which isn't capable of full HD resolution? Take a gue$$ | This thread | Refback | Fri May 10, 2013 12:49pm |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Changing an incorrect call | tref | Basketball | 43 | Thu May 10, 2012 08:15pm |
Why No Replay Review? | CraigD | Baseball | 48 | Thu Oct 21, 2010 09:53am |
How is this fair? Replay Review Colt/Bears | Unit14 | Football | 15 | Mon Sep 08, 2008 05:14pm |
NCAA Th night: Replay review on 3 pt shot | pizanno | Basketball | 4 | Fri Mar 18, 2005 07:18pm |
incorrect call | mgaeta | Volleyball | 3 | Thu Apr 17, 2003 08:06pm |