The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Help on rules interpretation (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/94475-help-rules-interpretation.html)

freejoe69 Sat Mar 23, 2013 10:56am

Help on rules interpretation
 
High-school JV game with veteran officials. One out, runner on second base. Batter lines out to centerfield, runner gets caught up the line on his way to third. Throw from CF is low and off line to second base. 2B leaves bag, traps ball and secures it, then takes ball out of his glove (not sure why), and comes back to tag the bag with his glove, beating the runner. Base umpire called runner safe and said that glove was not an extension of the baseball. I looked this situation up on some other umpire sites and saw interpretations that were 180 degrees apart. Too late now, obviously, but I'm interested to know. Citations, please.

johnnyg08 Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:02am

Quote:

Originally Posted by freejoe69 (Post 886180)
High-school JV game with veteran officials. One out, runner on second base. Batter lines out to centerfield, runner gets caught up the line on his way to third. Throw from CF is low and off line to second base. 2B leaves bag, traps ball and secures it, then takes ball out of his glove (not sure why), and comes back to tag the bag with his glove, beating the runner. Base umpire called runner safe and said that glove was not an extension of the baseball. I looked this situation up on some other umpire sites and saw interpretations that were 180 degrees apart. Too late now, obviously, but I'm interested to know. Citations, please.

"Veterans" working JV huh?

As long as the glove was properly worn, and the ball firmly secured in his hand, the runner should be out on appeal.

I'm not going to look it up, but it's the same logic at the first baseman's foot tagging 1B when the batter-runner grounds out to F6.

Those "veteran" umpires, if this story is exactly as you describe it, need to spend some time in the rule book and quit making up rules.

freejoe69 Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:10am

Yup. I should qualify--veteran HS varsity-level officials. Your thoughts on the logic of it are exactly as mine were, but he sold the call and it was snowing at the time, so I didn't pursue it.

bluehair Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:10am

Citation: Fed 8-4-2(i)

johnnyg08 Sat Mar 23, 2013 01:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluehair (Post 886183)
Citation: Fed 8-4-2(i)

Thanks Bluehair

jicecone Sat Mar 23, 2013 03:47pm

Well if it is snowing, and your a veteran umpire and make a call of safe and I am your assignor, your next game is Freshmen Ball.

Fed2You Sat Mar 23, 2013 07:13pm

Force Out?
 
In the OP, is the runner trying to get back to the bag because he didn't tag up, thus making it a force out?

Because on a play which requires the runner to be tagged, touching a runner with the glove and the ball in the other hand does not lead to an out. The ball must be in the glove if the glove is used to tag him.

From NFHS Rules By Topic (pg 85) "The tag must include the ball. If the ball isn't in the glove, the glove touching the runner has no effect."

jicecone Sat Mar 23, 2013 07:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fed2You (Post 886289)
In the OP, is the runner trying to get back to the bag because he didn't tag up, thus making it a force out?

Because on a play which requires the runner to be tagged, touching a runner with the glove and the ball in the other hand does not lead to an out. The ball must be in the glove if the glove is used to tag him.

From NFHS Rules By Topic (pg 85) "The tag must include the ball. If the ball isn't in the glove, the glove touching the runner has no effect."

Repeat after me 10 times:

It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out

Publius Sat Mar 23, 2013 08:07pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by freejoe69 (Post 886182)
...it was snowing at the time, so I didn't pursue it.

Veteran coach--or a quick study.

Rich Sat Mar 23, 2013 08:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fed2You (Post 886289)
In the OP, is the runner trying to get back to the bag because he didn't tag up, thus making it a force out?

Please explain one scenario (any one will do) in baseball where a runner can be forced back to a bag.

(Hint: There are none.)

Steven Tyler Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 886312)
Please explain one scenario (any one will do) in baseball where a runner can be forced back to a bag.

(Hint: There are none.)

It's stuff like that is why this forum doesn't hold water anymore...think about it. He more that likely knows the right answer, but not the terminology.

Steven Tyler Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jicecone (Post 886294)
Repeat after me 10 times:

It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out

after me ten times..................................:D

Now what do I do, coach?

Rich Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:17am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Tyler (Post 886334)
It's stuff like that is why this forum doesn't hold water anymore...think about it. He more that likely knows the right answer, but not the terminology.

Then he learned something. Isn't that why this place is here?

johnnyg08 Sun Mar 24, 2013 08:59am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jicecone (Post 886294)
Repeat after me 10 times:

It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out
It is not a Force Out

Best post of the thread.

Rich Ives Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:21am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fed2You (Post 886289)
In the OP, is the runner trying to get back to the bag because he didn't tag up, thus making it a force out?

Because on a play which requires the runner to be tagged, touching a runner with the glove and the ball in the other hand does not lead to an out. The ball must be in the glove if the glove is used to tag him.

From NFHS Rules By Topic (pg 85) "The tag must include the ball. If the ball isn't in the glove, the glove touching the runner has no effect."

This play (an appeal, not a force) does not require that the runner be tagged. The base can be tagged. When tagging a base the ball has to be held securely in the hand or glove and the base tagged with the body (includes gloves, shoes, hair, uniform, etc.)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1