|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
That's why the follow-through interference is basically just a reset - no outs.
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
Carelessly is not the same as unintentionally or the same as illegally. You could intentionally release the bat in an effort to hit the pitch but do so carelessly and hit the catcher instead.
If you're going to throw the bat at the ball, it should be at the ball and away from the catcher (or really where the catcher should reasonable be expected to be). If it's thrown carelessly, even if it's a legal attempt to hit the ball, I don't see why you wouldn't issue the warning the same way you would when the player releases the bat on the follow through and sends it flying. |
|
|||
6.05(h) Comment "... If a whole bat is thrown into fair territory and interferes with a defensive player attempting to make a play, interference shall be called, whether intentional or not..."
|
|
|||
Quote:
Some disagreements on here, or debates, are the result of people with opposing understandings of something trying to talk through the situation and resolve it, in order to make us better umpires. Other debates or debaters come from people just saying whatever they can to "win" the argument. This sort of thing serves no purpose, and doesn't make anyone better. Your response, here, is the latter. Rich was referring to THIS scenario. Your "rebuttal" (using the term incredibly loosely) has nothing at all to do with this scenario (unless, I guess, you're allowing the catcher to set up in fair territory, or are imagining a scenario where the batter tosses the bat to hit a pitch out... hits it... and somehow defying physics the bat propels itself into fair territory to interfere with someone trying to field that hit.)
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
There's a reasonable expectation that the batter should hold onto his bat after swinging at a pitch near the strike zone. And there's certainly an expectation that he should hold onto it after making contact with the pitch. When he doesn't, the bat usually goes propellering into the backstop or, worse, against the catcher or umpire. That is clearly careless. But when a batter actually tosses his bat on a pitch-out, how is that supposed to be careless? He's making a bonafide attempt to contact the ball! And the bat doesn't go flying into the dugout or over the fence. It just ends up maybe a few feet beyond the dirt circle. It might not be the smartest thing to do in terms of successfully batting the ball, but it's not careless. And it's something I certainly shouldn't be warning the batter about.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
Quote:
You have to be kidding. This is after the ball has been hit. It's not the attempt to hit the ball.
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
Quote:
"It does if his intent is to hit the pitch. There is NO LEGAL WAY you can punish a batter for making a legitimate attempt to hit a pitch." How can that be classified as being in general?
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
If he throws the bat after a legitimate swing and it interferes with a fielder making a play in fair territory it is interference.
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Other debates or debaters come from people just saying whatever they can to "win" the argument. This sort of thing serves no purpose, and doesn't make anyone better. Your response, here, is the latter. Rich was referring to THIS scenario. Your "rebuttal" (using the term incredibly loosely) has nothing at all to do with this scenario (unless, I guess, you're allowing the catcher to set up in fair territory, or are imagining a scenario where the batter tosses the bat to hit a pitch out... hits it... and somehow defying physics the bat propels itself into fair territory to interfere with someone trying to field that hit.)
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
Eg: I am doing a game the other day and R3 is coming home and does not slide. The catcher is on 1B side of plate and receives a low throw from right side of field. Reaches over and tags R3 around the ankle, causing him to flip/trip over the catcher. Two players, playing within the rules and just not executing the plays normal with good baseball techniques. My partner ejects R3 for malicious contact. The coaches question the call. I am not asked to get involved and don't. It is obvious that it looked malicious to my partner and he made the call but, I don't believe his interpretation of the rules were consistent with "malicious contact" and therefore because something unusual happened, he felt he had to react with a ruling, that I believe was incorrect. Sometimes you just have to umpire. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Catcher throws ball & hits bat of batter walking off after strikeout. | Linknblue | Softball | 7 | Tue Jun 19, 2012 08:10am |
Throws his glove then throws ball to DBT | BigGuy | Baseball | 10 | Wed Apr 18, 2007 03:40pm |
Coach Throws His Cap | Chess Ref | Softball | 7 | Fri May 19, 2006 01:53pm |
Free Throws | flaref0812 | Basketball | 2 | Wed Sep 21, 2005 03:34pm |
Batter throws bat | klp3515 | Baseball | 1 | Fri Apr 16, 2004 10:16am |