The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 10:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dayton, WY
Posts: 37
force slide rule?

I'm a football guy, but last night in my son's game (babe ruth league) runner was going home and throw forced catcher up the line(15ft) to catch it. Catcher jumps to catch ball and runner collides with his legs. Umpire calls runner out for not sliding/avoiding catcher. Is this the correct call?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 10:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
The short answer is: it's very hard to know.

Here's the rule: the relevant rule is not the force play slide rule, but rather the rule that says a runner must slide or avoid contact with a fielder who has the ball. It's not clear from your description that this rule applies to your case: at the moment of collision, the fielder did not have the ball or had not had it for long.

Also, the runner might have been trying to avoid a collision, but the throw took the catcher into his path. In that case, he has not violated the rule, and it's just what what we call a train wreck.

But if the fielder had the ball and the runner did not avoid contact and did not slide, then it would be a correct call. That's very hard to know without seeing the play.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 10:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
First of all, I do not know of ANY league that has a MUST SLIDE rule. Most rules say avoid or slide, and if you slide that there is criteria that needs to be adhereed to, to make it legal.

Having said that there is no way we can know exactly what took place at your son's game. Did the catcher jump up into the path of the runner? Did the runner try to take the catchers legs out? Was it just incidental contact and they were both doing what they were supposed to?

It is logical that if the runner was NOT avoiding the catcher that he would collide with his legs rather than his midsection, because the catcher jumped. If that was the case then I agree with the call.

Ask your son, what his intentions were?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 11:07am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
HTBT situation. Unless there is a rule in Babe Ruth that talks about some slide rule differently than it is at the NF or NCAA level, then not sure how a runner could be out for what you describe.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 11:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
If the league is playing by real Babe Ruth rules, there is no FPSR. Many leagues add this for safety and all it means that the runner does not have to slide, but if the runner chooses to slide he must do so legally.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 11:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dayton, WY
Posts: 37
my son was the catcher, he didn't have the ball yet, as the throw was in the air coming towards homeplate but up the line, he went up the line and jumped to catch it and had his legs contacted by the runner and then the umpire called the runner out. I don't believe the contact was intentional at all, just two players going in opposite directions to make a play.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 11:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyo-referee View Post
my son was the catcher, he didn't have the ball yet, as the throw was in the air coming towards homeplate but up the line, he went up the line and jumped to catch it and had his legs contacted by the runner and then the umpire called the runner out. I don't believe the contact was intentional at all, just two players going in opposite directions to make a play.
As others have stated, Babe Ruth does not have a "MUST SLIDE" rule. Some local organizations may.

Obviously, our standard answer to most of these things is "I would have to have been there" to properly judge.
As I am envisioning the scenario you described, I would not have called the runner out. It sounds like an errant throw drew the catcher into harms way and if he didn't have the ball in his possession, that is his problem, not the runners. Without malicious contact, I got nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 12:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dayton, WY
Posts: 37
thanks for the information, I was skeptical about the ruling even though it went in our favor.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 12:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyo-referee View Post
my son was the catcher, he didn't have the ball yet, as the throw was in the air coming towards homeplate but up the line, he went up the line and jumped to catch it and had his legs contacted by the runner and then the umpire called the runner out. I don't believe the contact was intentional at all, just two players going in opposite directions to make a play.
HTBT ... but this sounds more like possible obstruction than possible interference. Without some sort of intentional move on the runner's part to interfere with the catch (like ... he veered INTO the catcher), I'd be hard pressed to find interference here.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 12:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Let's bear in mind two distinct provisions of the rules:

1. FPSR: FED and NCAA have this, it applies to force plays, and it requires runners who choose to slide (not required) to slide directly into and not past the base to which they were forced, and otherwise to refrain from affecting the play at and around the base.

2. Slide or avoid: nearly all non-pro leagues have this rule, which prevents intentionally crashing a catcher who has the ball. The runner must slide, go around, or give himself up if the catcher has the ball.

The FPSR, despite the thread's title, is irrelevant to the OP. The question concerns the slide or avoid rule, and it sounds as if the catcher didn't have the ball when the collision took place or, if he did, that the throw drew him into the path of the runner.

Although I couldn't say for sure without seeing the play, based on the description from the catcher's father (if biased, biased in favor of the umpire's call), the call was likely incorrect. Train wrecks sometimes happen, and not all contact at the plate is illegal.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 01:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
HTBT ... but this sounds more like possible obstruction than possible interference.
As you know, it would not be OBS if the ball was nearly there.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 01:03pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
HTBT ... but this sounds more like possible obstruction than possible interference. Without some sort of intentional move on the runner's part to interfere with the catch (like ... he veered INTO the catcher), I'd be hard pressed to find interference here.
Train wreck...........toot, toot.
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 01:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
Here is my basic rule of thumb (OBR/Babe Ruth):
a) Fielder recieving accurate, inflight throw + normal collision = Interference (out)
b) Fielder with ball + intentional, violent collision = Malicious contact (out & ejection)
c) Fielder recieving errant throw + collision = train wreck (play on)
d) Fielder retreiving errant throw or missed ball + collision = "type A" obstruction (immediate dead ball / runner advances)

a & d would be somewhat different for FED rules.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 01:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
Let's bear in mind two distinct provisions of the rules:

1. FPSR: FED and NCAA have this, it applies to force plays, and it requires runners who choose to slide (not required) to slide directly into and not past the base to which they were forced, and otherwise to refrain from affecting the play at and around the base.

2. Slide or avoid: nearly all non-pro leagues have this rule, which prevents intentionally crashing a catcher who has the ball. The runner must slide, go around, or give himself up if the catcher has the ball.

The FPSR, despite the thread's title, is irrelevant to the OP. The question concerns the slide or avoid rule, and it sounds as if the catcher didn't have the ball when the collision took place or, if he did, that the throw drew him into the path of the runner.

Although I couldn't say for sure without seeing the play, based on the description from the catcher's father (if biased, biased in favor of the umpire's call), the call was likely incorrect. Train wrecks sometimes happen, and not all contact at the plate is illegal.
great points!

Too many umpires think just because there is contact you have to call something - not always true though!

Thanks
DAvid
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 03:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyo-referee View Post
my son was the catcher, he didn't have the ball yet, as the throw was in the air coming towards homeplate but up the line, he went up the line and jumped to catch it and had his legs contacted by the runner and then the umpire called the runner out. I don't believe the contact was intentional at all, just two players going in opposite directions to make a play.
Beginning to sound more like a train wreck. As you said, it appeared that both players were doing what they should have been doing.

I agree that many officials feel that contact requires a call but the problem is they seem to think that the call must be either obstruction or interference. They forget that most of the time, the safe signal and "That's Nothing!" is the correct choice to make. Just goes to show you that experience, knowledge of the rules and the game make a better official.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
force play slide rule ncaa newump Baseball 9 Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:09am
FED - Force Play Slide Rule David Emerling Baseball 20 Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:14am
force play slide rule? ggk Baseball 41 Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:12pm
Force Play slide rule Bill Boos Baseball 11 Fri Mar 18, 2005 04:20pm
NCAA Force Play Slide Rule Randallump Baseball 6 Sat Apr 21, 2001 07:15pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1