The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 12, 2003, 11:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NeverNeverLand
Posts: 1,036
Lil' help here please!

I know I had this on a thread b4 but can't find it and can't find a case play to help me understand.

Situation:

Quest 1: R1 on 1st is stealing on the pitch. Catcher obstructs swing of B2 and there is no throw made to 2nd to attempt to retire runner.

Does Manager have choice on this play?

ex1: Since R1 was stealing on the play, can Manager decide to have R1 put on 2nd and leave B2 at bat because he may be the best hitter? And, if so, is the pitch a ball, strike, or a no pitch?

or,

ex2: Have R1 put on 2nd and B2 put on 1st?

or, is there no choice here?

R1 to 2nd, B2 to 1st?

Quest 2: Same situation accept catcher is hurt and runner continues to third base.

Would PU call Time and Dead Ball after
R1 reached 2nd?

or,

Let play continue until runner/runners have stopped advancing?
__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words".
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 12, 2003, 01:03pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Jim Evans, in his annotated, has suggested that an option should only be provided on a play where the batter is able to bat the ball, despite the interference.

Here is the passage:

"A play following interference should be construed to mean a play which results from a ball being batted despite the interference. A play which develops after an interference and is the result of a passed ball or a wild pitch should be governed by the award of first base to the batter and one base to any runner attempting to steal when the defensive interference occurs. ..7.04(d) and 7.07."

Rich
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 12, 2003, 01:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Fed Rule 8.1.1e and Note 1

"A batter becomes a runner when the catcher or an other defensive player obstructs him. The coach or captian of the team at bat, after being informed by the UIC of obstruction, shall indicate whether or not he elects to decline the obstruction penalty and accept the resulting play. Such election shall be made before the next pitch(legal or illegal), before the award of an intentional base on balls, or before the infielders leave the diamond. Obstruction of the batter is ignored if the batter-runner reaches first and all other runners advance at least on base."

A runner attempting to steal will be awarded that base. All other runners will return to base at TOP if obstruction is enforced.

Delayed Dead ball

Question 1 & 2. No choice, Put R1 at second because he was stealing or/an was forced because B1 is awarded first.

As unfortunate as it may be, the catcher getting hurt has no bearing on the play.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 12, 2003, 01:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Thanks Rich, I was just about to clarify that
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 12, 2003, 03:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
Must the batter actually make contact with the ball in order for the coach to have a choice?

Abel on 3B, score tied, bottom of the last inning.

Abel not stealing on the pitch. Batter Baker swings, knocks the catcher's glove off, and the ball goes back to the screen. Abel scores the winning run.

Since Baker did not hit the ball, does he have to go to 1B and Abel back to 3B?

Differences between Fed, OBR, NCAA?
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 12, 2003, 05:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
"Must the batter actually make contact with the ball in order for the coach to have a choice?"

Good question. Fed talks about catcher obstruction and OBR and NCAA say catcher interference.

They all talk about a PLAY following the interference, and then, an option given to the coach/manager. The definition of "Play" is the same for NCAA and OBR however it is a little better defined in Fed. Having said that, I guess somewhere in there, the batter making contact with the ball is necessary.

OBR and NCAA seem to be clearer on this with follow-on rules and/or commentary.

Fed 8.1.1 e, NCAA 8.2e and OBR 6.08c

To answer your 2nd question,yes, OBR "runners not attempting to steal or not forced, to advance remain on the base occupied at the time of interference", "the batter is awarded first".

The concept of how to apply this is much easier to understand than the language use to explain it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1