The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 25, 2011, 12:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 751
Another "Crossed-Up" Catcher

What a wonderful would we live in.....

Umpire Claims Pitcher, Catcher Conspired to Intentionally Hit Him With Pitch (Video) - Daily Blend - NESN.com
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 25, 2011, 12:59pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,525
I saw this on another site. Clearly intentional and I hope it comes back to haunt that catcher.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 25, 2011, 01:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 243
Thanks for posting this. Whether this was intentional or not, it was disturbing to read the number of responses on NESN stating that umpires deserve this.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 25, 2011, 01:19pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
Well, I never filed a police report when this happened to me, but I did eject the pitcher, catcher, and manager and eventually forfeited the game.

Mine was even more blatant -- it was a fastball to the middle of the chest and the catcher held his glove at the knee and never moved it. And held it there well after I got hit with the pitch.

Good for the umpire, although there's no way he's going to able to prove intent based on that video.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 25, 2011, 01:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lindenhurst, IL
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Good for the umpire, although there's no way he's going to able to prove intent based on that video.
Beyond a reasonable doubt or based on the preponderance of the evidence?

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 25, 2011, 01:37pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,525
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Good for the umpire, although there's no way he's going to able to prove intent based on that video.
I do not know about that. And he will not have to prove it to anyone, the prosecutor will if they decide to take the case that far or have to take it that far. Maybe the threat of jail, a record or even spending a lot of money might get a plea deal. After all most people never go to trial.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)

Last edited by JRutledge; Thu Aug 25, 2011 at 03:27pm.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 25, 2011, 03:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 88
Either that pitcher is throwing marshmallows, or that ump has a serious pain threshold.

Dude didn't even move when he got plunked.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 25, 2011, 03:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 323
Send a message via AIM to aceholleran
This looks intentional to me. I dunno about criminal charges, though. Tough to prove.

ace
__________________
There is no such thing as idiot-proof, only idiot-resistant.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 25, 2011, 03:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 243
Catcher has plenty of time after the R1 reaches 2B to check on the umpire or call time out to talk to the pitcher about the "cross-up." It looks like when the catcher does nothing but goes back into his crouch the umpire calls time and walks off. For the catcher's own safety, if he had to bail that early to block a pitch because he was crossed up, he'd want to talk to the pitcher. No doubt intentional.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 25, 2011, 09:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 253
Totally agree it was intentional. Still, I don't think I walk off and file a police report. Seems most agree it was intentional but I wonder what the rest of you would do? I think I toss the F1, F2, and HC. File a report. I don't think I call the police anymore than a batter would for being intentionally hit.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 25, 2011, 09:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
I once had a catcher that was wearing a sunvisor on his mask tell me the sun got in his eyes. This was the next inning after I called him out on strikes for the second time in the game. I stood up and told the Coach to "Lose Your Catcher, because he outta here." This was Am Leg ball. He was suspended for the season. Another time I tossed the Coach, pitcher and catcher afterwards. Catcher said "He fooled me with a curve ball". Just the fact that both catchers came up with lame excuse right afterwards was the giveaway.

You do enough games its going to happen.

In both cases I am glad I had good CP's on.

Without a doubt the hit on this umpire was intentional. He should have ejected some people but, you never know how your going to reacte to these situations. Just hope he gets backing from the League and Association, if not then by all means leaving the game and fileing a police report was proper. Im not second guessing anything this umpire did because I have been there and done that, twice.

Last edited by jicecone; Thu Aug 25, 2011 at 09:38pm.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 26, 2011, 12:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,458
What we're forgetting here is where, exactly, this guy got hit. If he was really hurt, he may not have been thinking straight, and just walked off the field without ejecting folks.

My son was 17, when played his last game as a catcher. Two out in the last inning, and he leaned over to glove an outside curveball. The batter nicked it, and it glanced off his neck.

He stood up, and proceded to remove all his gear, and placed it nicely on the plate. Then, he sat beside me on the dugout bench.

"What's up?"

"I'm done."

"Jimmy, go get the gear one"

We figure the blow shut off the blood flow to his brain for a bit. He got checked out that evening, and everything was fine. But baseballs to the body can make folks to funny things.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 26, 2011, 07:57am
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 391
I agree, as well, it's hard to prove anything from the video. The fact there's a runner on goes against the umpire, but I do not know what the score was at the time this occurred.

But just watching the catcher makes be think this is intentional. The pitch is nowhere near the dirt, yet the catcher crouches and ducks as if he's trying to smother a ball in the dirt. The catcher doesn't even track the pitch with his eyes/head whatsoever.

In 27 years, nothing like this has ever happened to me. I sure hope that it doesn't. I'm not likely to walk off and file a police report, but I am likely to file ejection paperwork (x3).
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 26, 2011, 08:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,262
I also think it looks intentional. I also don't think it would be terrible hard to convince people it was intentional.

I see tossing the catcher, after all it's his (in)action that's the cause of this. Why, however, do we assume the pitcher had any part in it? For all we know, the catcher did call for the fastball in and the pitcher threw it in good faith that his catcher would do his job. Likewise with the coach. Unless you'd issued a warning to both teams a la intentionally throwing at a batter I don't see dumping the HC and even then I don't see dumping the pitcher who is an unwitting participant. After all, we don't dump the catcher when the pitcher throws at someone.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 26, 2011, 11:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastshire View Post
I also think it looks intentional. I also don't think it would be terrible hard to convince people it was intentional.

I see tossing the catcher, after all it's his (in)action that's the cause of this. Why, however, do we assume the pitcher had any part in it? For all we know, the catcher did call for the fastball in and the pitcher threw it in good faith that his catcher would do his job. Likewise with the coach. Unless you'd issued a warning to both teams a la intentionally throwing at a batter I don't see dumping the HC and even then I don't see dumping the pitcher who is an unwitting participant. After all, we don't dump the catcher when the pitcher throws at someone.
For sure, players with good coaches wouldn't even consiuder this crap. Dumping the coach is usually the correct call and the correct message to send.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight pizanno Basketball 27 Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am
Finding a "good" video/DVD on 2 man mechanics" Linknblue Basketball 3 Mon Dec 10, 2007 09:55am
Can "FOUL" be made "FAIR"? PAT THE REF Baseball 60 Sat Feb 24, 2007 09:01pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1