|
Thu Jul 28, 2011, 06:55pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
So by that logic a player (who is not a runner) could INTENTIONALLY get hit with a thrown ball and nothing should be called. I don't think that is the intent.
The rules say a RUNNER cannot INTENTIONALLY interfere with a thrown ball. They also say that players and coaches who are not runners cannot HINDER a fielder's attempt at fielding a thrown ball. I think it is a poorly written rule, and as has been pointed out, the comment addresses a coach (and invokes intent), although coaches are exempted in the rule and intent is not mentioned. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| KC @ STL - Batters interference not called ? | _Bruno_ | Baseball | 20 | Mon May 25, 2009 11:48am |
| Game 5 Called! | IRISHMAFIA | Softball | 4 | Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:48pm |
| interference--who would have called this the same way? | Tap | Softball | 26 | Mon Sep 08, 2003 05:20pm |
| Interference Called? | Chuck Turner | Softball | 11 | Tue Jun 24, 2003 12:24pm |
| I called ump interference. Right or wrong? | Danny R | Baseball | 2 | Wed May 01, 2002 05:47pm |
Threaded Mode
