The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 16, 2011, 11:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
1. Not enough information.

2. Not enough information.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 16, 2011, 07:38pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
...

2. Not enough information.
Huh?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 16, 2011, 08:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Video: MLB.com Gameday | MLB.com: Gameday

It's the 2nd play shown.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 17, 2011, 02:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 60
A little depressing to see that, where the link takes us to, both the written account and the announcers' descripton refer to this as interference.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 17, 2011, 02:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by gotblue? View Post
A little depressing to see that, where the link takes us to, both the written account and the announcers' descripton refer to this as interference.
It doesn't surprise me anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 17, 2011, 10:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
Not going to say its impossible for BU2 to see that INT, but it certainly would be alot easier from the outside as was the positioning many years ago. Ball is primary responsibility of course, and with the INT happening on the backside of BU2, its going to be tough to really see. In fact, if he did see the whole thing, I'd wonder why he abandoned watching the ball.

Good job by U3 to realize U2 wasn't in a good spot to see it and jump on it. And correct mechanic as this is type B, do not kill until play is made on that runner. Nice to see the MLB guys get this right since they see it far less frequently than we all do...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 17, 2011, 11:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by TussAgee11 View Post
Not going to say its impossible for BU2 to see that INT, but it certainly would be alot easier from the outside as was the positioning many years ago. Ball is primary responsibility of course, and with the INT happening on the backside of BU2, its going to be tough to really see. In fact, if he did see the whole thing, I'd wonder why he abandoned watching the ball.

Good job by U3 to realize U2 wasn't in a good spot to see it and jump on it. And correct mechanic as this is type B, do not kill until play is made on that runner. Nice to see the MLB guys get this right since they see it far less frequently than we all do...
First off, it's OBS, not INT.

Secondly, I've never known U2 to set up outside with R1. Granted, I haven't studied video of baseball of previous eras, but this video (click on the Video Clip, located on the right side, near the bottom) of Lou Brock shows U2 inside the diamond.

Thirdly, even if U2 was outside, he's still probably going to miss the OBS. His eyes, as you mentioned, are on the ball AND the play occurs after 2B. U3 has the best view, as he's at 3B watching the ball being fielded, which puts OBS in direct line of his watching the play.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1