The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Dropped Third Strike - Check Swing (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/66232-dropped-third-strike-check-swing.html)

barkmo Mon Apr 04, 2011 10:05am

Dropped Third Strike - Check Swing
 
OBR:
No runners, 0 outs. 0 balls, 2 strikes
Pitch in dirt, batter half swing, ruled ball by home umpire. Catcher first tags runner then appeals for ruling on check swing. Base ump rules swing.

Question does the timing of the tag matter in this situation? What if catcher throw ball into LF (over throws 3B)?

mbyron Mon Apr 04, 2011 10:11am

The timing of the tag does not matter. The BR is out if he's tagged, even if the appeal happens after the tag. The batter becomes a runner (and so is liable to be tagged out) after a third strike not legally caught, not after the BU rules on the half swing. So your "overthrow" is irrelevant (I assume F2 is throwing the ball around after the K).

When I'm BU, this is the situation where I will give my ruling on a half swing without being asked. I follow the Bob Jenkins school on this point, and will come up with my ruling when:

1. the batter offered
2. the PU doesn't get it immediately
3. F2 doesn't legally catch the pitch, and
4. the BR can run (2 outs or no R1)

The rationale for jumping in with this call is fairness to the BR.

TussAgee11 Mon Apr 04, 2011 10:31am

Voluntary strike - the BU can, and should, call strike if he has a swing once PU has ruled no swing on a D3K.

bob jenkins Mon Apr 04, 2011 10:43am

Agreed w/ mbyron and TussAgee, but it's a reasonably advanced mechanic. That is, if you do it as BU with an inexperienced PU and no pre-game on it, expect a "deer in the headlights" look at best.

nopachunts Mon Apr 04, 2011 11:42am

Throw Into Left Field
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barkmo (Post 746679)
What if catcher throw ball into LF (over throws 3B)?

Why would F2 be throwing toward LF, no runners were on base?

mbyron Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:08pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by nopachunts (Post 746713)
Why would F2 be throwing toward LF, no runners were on base?

Throwing it around the infield after the K. I had to ponder that a moment, too. ;)

nopachunts Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 746721)
Throwing it around the infield after the K. I had to ponder that a moment, too. ;)

Makes sense

Simply The Best Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 746699)
Agreed w/ mbyron and TussAgee, but it's a reasonably advanced mechanic. That is, if you do it as BU with an inexperienced PU and no pre-game on it, expect a "deer in the headlights" look at best.

Better to get it right than worry about an inexperienced partner's overreaction. Well done, Bob! :)

dileonardoja Mon Apr 04, 2011 02:15pm

This definitely needs a pregame. And if you pregame it the mechanic should be for the PU going to BU IMMEDIATELY after the uncaught 3rd strike/check swing.

Initiation by the BU can create a bad situation. For example, say it was a full count and the PU has a checked swing (thus BB). Now here comes BU with a reversal when DEF hasn't appealed or PU hasn't asked for help . OC is going to get fired up.

mbyron Mon Apr 04, 2011 02:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by dileonardoja (Post 746738)
Initiation by the BU can create a bad situation. For example, say it was a full count and the PU has a checked swing (thus BB). Now here comes BU with a reversal when DEF hasn't appealed or PU hasn't asked for help . OC is going to get fired up.

If it gives his BR a chance to reach 1B, he won't say a word.

This is, as others have pointed out, an advanced mechanic. If you're not comfortable using it, then don't. But it does not have bad consequences when used properly.

MikeStrybel Mon Apr 04, 2011 03:51pm

Just to clarify, are you suggesting that the BU make the call on a check swing WITHOUT the PU asking for help?

UmpJM Mon Apr 04, 2011 04:05pm

MikeStrybel,

Although it's not entirely clear from your post who you are responding to, if it's any of mbyron, TussAgee, or Bob Jenkins, that's not EXACTLY what they're saying - but it's close.

I believe they are suggesting that in this sitch, IDEALLY the PU will go to his BU immediately, even if the defense does not immediately request that he do so.

However, under this advanced mechanic, should the PU should fail to come to him immediately, the BU is instructed to make the call of strike (assuming he judged an "offer", of course.) even without being asked by the PU.

Yes, I'm sure.

JM

bob jenkins Mon Apr 04, 2011 08:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeStrybel (Post 746763)
Just to clarify, are you suggesting that the BU make the call on a check swing WITHOUT the PU asking for help?

Standard Mechanic: PU waits for coach or catcher to ask, then asks BU.

Advanced Mechanic: PU asks without being asked.

Really Advanced Mechanic: BU responds, even if not asked (but gives PU a beat or two to ask), and then only if it's a strike AND if B can become BR.

MrUmpire Mon Apr 04, 2011 08:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeStrybel (Post 746763)
Just to clarify, are you suggesting that the BU make the call on a check swing WITHOUT the PU asking for help?

Yep. Bob listed when. (How long have you been gone? This has been an accepted mechanic in NCAA for quite some time and worked its way to high school years ago.)

It prevents the batter from becoming a sitting duck.

Simply The Best Mon Apr 04, 2011 11:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 746879)
Really Advanced Mechanic: BU responds, even if not asked (but gives PU a beat or two to ask), and then only if it's a strike AND if B can become BR.

Really advanced. :eek: In my instruction, this is really basic. Others MMV.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1