The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 23, 2011, 09:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 268
Unhappy NFHS Baseball Test Part 1

Our high school association went through the test last night. In my 30 years of high school officiating, I have never seen such a poorly written exam. After years of true/false question, ambiguous multiple choice questions were the norm.

I think they should just try to see if you know the rules, not spend the whole time seeing if they can trick you by word play.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 23, 2011, 09:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by SE Minnestoa Re View Post
Our high school association went through the test last night. In my 30 years of high school officiating, I have never seen such a poorly written exam. After years of true/false question, ambiguous multiple choice questions were the norm.

I think they should just try to see if you know the rules, not spend the whole time seeing if they can trick you by word play.
OTOH, if they can trick you maybe you don't know all the little ins and outs as well as one should.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 23, 2011, 10:26am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,790
My state threw 5 of the questions out. 1 of the questions was, quite simply, a train wreck, but the other four tested what I consider to be important concepts, such as:

-- F1 can legally throw to F6 in position on a pickoff play to second
-- The proper award for obstruction on a pickoff play at first where F3 obstructs is second base
-- A pitcher can legally turn his shoulders in the set position prior to coming set
-- I can't think of the fourth one

We've dumbed down the process of teaching and requiring people to know things so much that the process of taking the test is relatively worthless for experienced umpires, IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 23, 2011, 11:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
I found it asinine that you have to answer a question wrong in order to get it right! The answer key was such a mess that we made up an answer sheet to guide people through the wrong answers correctly. The FED really blew this year's test right out the window!
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 23, 2011, 11:12am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900 View Post
I found it asinine that you have to answer a question wrong in order to get it right! The answer key was such a mess that we made up an answer sheet to guide people through the wrong answers correctly. The FED really blew this year's test right out the window!
Which ones? Send me a PM if you'd like. I'm curious -- I have the test here and really didn't see a whole lot wrong with it, with the exception of the FED screwing up its own definition of runner (versus "retired runner") in one of the answers.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 23, 2011, 11:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Which ones? Send me a PM if you'd like. I'm curious -- I have the test here and really didn't see a whole lot wrong with it, with the exception of the FED screwing up its own definition of runner (versus "retired runner") in one of the answers.
I like the general format of the test.

Two questions that had the wrong answers, IMO:

Who can agree to shorten a game that's 22-1 in the third inning?

What does BU use to determine a checked swing?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 23, 2011, 11:14am
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
In my opinion, I really like this test. It forces you to look up the rules, especially on the multiple choice ones. I saw several officials think they could just take the test and do well, and that's simply not the case...the test is supposed to get you to open the book which is probably a good thing. If you looked up each question in the book, the test wasn't that hard. Time consuming...yes. Worth the time, every second.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 23, 2011, 05:56pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
In my opinion, I really like this test. It forces you to look up the rules, especially on the multiple choice ones. I saw several officials think they could just take the test and do well, and that's simply not the case...the test is supposed to get you to open the book which is probably a good thing. If you looked up each question in the book, the test wasn't that hard. Time consuming...yes. Worth the time, every second.
Yes, their is shallow genius behind the ingrained madness.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 23, 2011, 04:43pm
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
Basketball Exam?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SE Minnestoa Re View Post
I think they should just try to see if you know the rules, not spend the whole time seeing if they can trick you by word play.
Should? Could? Would? Shall? Might? May?

Blech!
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 23, 2011, 04:58pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by grunewar View Post
Should? Could? Would? Shall? Might? May?

Blech!
My attitude is this: I don't care as long as I can score above the minimum required to stay at my current umpiring level. I have to send in 7 NFHS exams yearly and I just got Part II in the mail today, so I have yet another exam to complete and send in.

My curiosity was satisfied when the two questions Bob mentioned were posted. And as usual, I agree with Bob.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NFHS Part II Test boboman316 Football 0 Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:34pm
NFHS Baseball Test budjones05 Baseball 6 Wed Apr 04, 2007 03:50pm
NFHS Part 1 Test seioaump Soccer 0 Tue Nov 15, 2005 04:37pm
NFHS Baseball Test Part 1 w_sohl Baseball 1 Tue Mar 02, 2004 03:25pm
NFHS 2003 Baseball Rules Exam-Part 1 w_sohl Baseball 10 Fri Mar 07, 2003 01:02pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1