The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 07, 2010, 11:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
... Basically it would have to be an intentional throwing of the bat into the baseball.
....
Quote:
Originally Posted by DG View Post
6.04H has the answer to all the questions, in summary live ball unless umpire judgment rules intent to interfere on the contact.
...
johnny & DG,

While I agree that UMPTT was correct and that 6.04(h) covers the situation, INTENT is not relevant to the ruling.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 07, 2010, 12:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: illinois
Posts: 251
Its actually 6.05h:
6.05 A batter is out when—
(h) After hitting or bunting a fair ball, his bat hits the ball a second time in fair territory. The ball is dead and no runners may advance. If the batter-runner drops his bat and the ball rolls against the bat in fair territory and, in the umpire’s judgment, there was no intention to interfere with the course of the ball, the ball is alive and in play;

Last edited by umpjong; Thu Oct 07, 2010 at 12:02pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 07, 2010, 12:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post
johnny & DG,

While I agree that UMPTT was correct and that 6.04(h) covers the situation, INTENT is not relevant to the ruling.

JM
It does if there IS intent.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 07, 2010, 08:52pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post
johnny & DG,

While I agree that UMPTT was correct and that 6.04(h) covers the situation, INTENT is not relevant to the ruling.

JM
"If the batter-runner drops the bat and the ball rolls against the stationary bat in fair territory and, in the umpire's judgment, there was no intention to interfere with the course of the ball, the ball is alive and in play, the same as if it had not hit the bat." MLBUM

Johnny's comment was different than mine so I stand by mine.

Last edited by DG; Thu Oct 07, 2010 at 08:56pm.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 07, 2010, 09:13pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
JM, you're a better writer than me so based on what I wrote, you might certainly interpret what I wrote differently...I'm okay with that. However, I'm missing where you feel that intent isn't part of the rule. Both the MLBUM interp posted by DG and the rule posted by umpjong both state intent as part of the rule. Help me understand what I'm missing?
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 08, 2010, 01:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

johnny,

The point I was trying to make (not very well) was that if the bat hits the ball, even if the umpire judges no intent, the BR is out and the ball is dead.

If the ball hits the bat, then the runner is not liable to be called out - unless the umpire judges intent; I can't imagine myself judging intent in the case where the ball hits the bat, but I suppose it's possible.

I apologize for creating confusion.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 08, 2010, 01:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post
johnny,

The point I was trying to make (not very well) was that if the bat hits the ball, even if the umpire judges no intent, the BR is out and the ball is dead.

If the ball hits the bat, then the runner is not liable to be called out - unless the umpire judges intent; I can't imagine myself judging intent in the case where the ball hits the bat, but I suppose it's possible.

I apologize for creating confusion.

JM
I've had it once. Batter bunted up the first base line and as he was running by the ball he looked down at the ball and dropped the bat right in front of it. Both my BU and I called him out immediately.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 08, 2010, 08:02pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post
johnny,

The point I was trying to make (not very well) was that if the bat hits the ball, even if the umpire judges no intent, the BR is out and the ball is dead.

If the ball hits the bat, then the runner is not liable to be called out - unless the umpire judges intent; I can't imagine myself judging intent in the case where the ball hits the bat, but I suppose it's possible.

I apologize for creating confusion.

JM
I can't imagine it either, it is a possibility though. I can't recall a time. However, I have had numerous cases of batted ball goes down and back up to hit bat while batter still in the box and with bat still in hand, usually on bunts. The latest was in the first round of HS playoffs this year. This is not in the rule book, but in all of the interp books, foul ball.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 08, 2010, 09:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by DG View Post
I can't imagine it either, it is a possibility though. I can't recall a time. However, I have had numerous cases of batted ball goes down and back up to hit bat while batter still in the box and with bat still in hand, usually on bunts. The latest was in the first round of HS playoffs this year. This is not in the rule book, but in all of the interp books, foul ball.
NCAA 7-7-e
OBR 6.05(g)
FED 7-2-1-f

Some were just changed this year. Gotta keep up ;-)
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Son throws no hitter SAump Baseball 1 Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:35am
On-Deck Hitter C'monBlue Baseball 13 Wed Apr 04, 2007 11:58am
slap hitter mccann Softball 15 Thu May 05, 2005 02:58pm
Additional Hitter richray Softball 3 Wed May 26, 2004 09:51pm
Cal's big hitter chris s Softball 12 Thu May 29, 2003 09:13pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1