![]() |
|
|||
Yes, we would "Have To Be There" to call this one because:
- You didn't tell us if there were any runners on base. - If there were, you didn't tell us if they were trying to advance. - If there were, we don't know which base were they advancing to. - Where was the catcher throwing the ball- to a base to make a play or back to the pitcher? - We don't know if the throw contacting the batter prevented the defense from making a play. Besides all that...why are you taking it upon yourself to instruct a player where to move or stand? They have coaches for that stuff! Doing so possibly interjects the umpire into the game in a manner he shouldn't, either giving the offense an advantage by helping the batter move to a position where he wouldn't interfere or giving the defense an advantage by placing the batter in a position where he did interfere when he would not have otherwise. Neither is a good thing! Let the players play the game and make their own decisions on where they need to move. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Called my first... | ManInBlue | Baseball | 10 | Sun Mar 14, 2010 08:52pm |
Would you have called INT? | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 13 | Wed May 14, 2008 07:53am |
What they want called, and what is called (Strike Zone again!) | FUBLUE | Softball | 30 | Tue May 13, 2008 05:14am |
Should I have called it? | Rachel | Softball | 6 | Mon Apr 16, 2007 09:10pm |
what should i have called | clips2 | Baseball | 22 | Mon Sep 25, 2006 08:40am |