Pre-game umpire conference

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

If my first instinct is, "he offered," I'll ring it any time -- no matter if I'm in A, B, C, D, E, I, E, I, or O.

Old McFronny had a farm.....

[David B]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

If my first instinct is, "he offered," I'll ring it any time -- no matter if I'm in A, B, C, D, E, I, E, I, or O. And I couldn't possibly care what a coach says -- he's not allowed to argue balls and strikes.

Yea I welcome the coach to come out and argue. It's a short conversation.

Thanks
David

[SAump]

Originally Posted by David B

Yea I welcome the coach to come out and argue. It's a short conversation.

Thanks
David

I don't cover check swing appeals in my pre-game with my partner.

[Tim C]

As I have said so many times before:

An umpire that claims you cannot call a checked (unchecked) swing from "inside" either does not understand the checked/unchecked swing rule or does not have the guts to make the call.

T

[BretMan]

My standard pre-game spiel for checked swings (if I'm the plate umpire) is to tell my partner that I might check with him no matter what position he's in. If he honestly couldn't tell if the batter went, whether it's because of the disadvantage of his positioning or any other reason, then make like Nancy Reagan and "Just say NO" (and give a safe signal- Nancy always forgot that part).

If I'm on the bases, I tell him to feel free to come to me no matter where I'm at and I'll give him my honest evaluation of the swing. If I'm not sure or can't tell if he went, I'm not going to overrule his call.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by yawetag

How many times have you changed the call to a strike from B and C? How often does the OC say something to the effect of "You can't tell from there!"

I always take that at confirmation that I got the call right.

It's your job to get it right from B or C (and A and D). Do it.

[BretMan]

If the guy I'm working with seems reluctant to get into coverages and such pre-game, I'll try to at least hit a few points where we are likely to have problems. It kind of depends on how you broach the subject. Some guys just seem to take being told how something should be handled as an affront to their knowledge and experience and it puts them on the defensive.

Instead of saying, "This is what we're going to do", I'll ask, "What happens if...". At least that way you're going to get some response and get some dialog going, plus get a feel for your partner's experience level and expectations.

This season most of my partners have been receptive to a good pre-game and, I'd like to think as a result, I can't really remember anything that came up where we had any problems in coverage or communication.

It helps that all of my games so far have been high school games with guys in the same association- an association that stresses the pre-game with your partner as a responsibility, provides a full page checklist of things to discuss and is proactive in training. This is a big association, with nearly 400 members, that we're told is one of the largest in the country. Of the 25-30 high school games I worked, I never worked with the same partner twice.

But the season is young! Once the travel and tournament seasons get going, I'll be working with more and more umpires from outside the area and you never know what you're going to get.

A couple of the more interesting pre-games I've had of late...

Worked with one guy this year who was doing his first game ever! He shows up at the field already dressed for the plate, so I let him have at it. We had lots of time to kill (the first game was running late) so I gave this guy about a half hour pre-game (that was more like a mini-rule and mechanics clinic).

Then the game started and I think this guy forgot EVERYTHING we had talked about!

Last year I had a guy who made a big deal of how he worked "minor league ball" and came off as a know-it-all. When I started to ask him about coverages, he cuts me off and says, "The base umpire has all plays on the bases, the plate umpire has all plays at the plate". It went downhill from there. This guy was practically inventing new mechanics at will. When I mentioned how something was described "in the umpire manual" he went on some tirade about how the manual was "stupid" and his way was better.

At some point, you just have to give up and be thankful that you'll likely never have to work with this partner again!

[jkumpire]

Where I work, just like where everyone else works, we have a cadre of people who care about the people who play the game, and the game itself. We have some people who don't work hard at umpiring, but try to do a good job, and some who just show up for the $$$.

It is a shame, but in these days of two parents working like mad to keep their financial heads above water, or one parent households trying to just survive with the economic mess they and our country is in, we need to be careful assigning motives to people. Yes, it stinks they don't want to do a pregame, but at least they are there to umpire the game. And until our country changes we will have lots of people who are umpiring for the wrong reasons, so let's make sure we do the best we can with the people we get.

As most of you know, the bigest problem we have is that on the HS level, all officials are trending up in age. We have fewer and fewer people who are young deciding to umpire on the HS level. The late teens, early 20's person is too busy, too poor, or too involved with other things to start officiating.

The fear I have is that one day there will not be enough officials for sports, and where wil the kids be?