![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
How do they know if there has been a third out at the plate? The PU is not going to immediately go the the BU for help, as he has the responsibility of watching for possible Batter Interference on the attempt to retire the runner. It's situations like these that the 4th out comes into play. |
[layman warning]
I got to thinking about it after I posted. Between that ruling and the conversation earlier, I had it in my head that the ruling allowed the defense to choose whether the batter would/would not come up the following inning after they asked for the check-swing appeal. Now, I don't think that's the case. If the batter is called out on the strikeout after the runner is out in this situation, the defense may choose whichever out benefits them, but the batter is still out in either case and does not lead off the following inning. Am I correct? |
Quote:
|
The "choice" in this situation is the actual appeal on the swing.
|
It isn't rocket science.
If there's an opportunity for a check-swing appeal then the batter could not possibly have been called out on a strikeout. The defense has a choice as to whether or not to appeal the check-swing. SO, as a matter of tactics: If you want the batter to lead off the next inning you do NOT appeal. He thus cannot be out as he hasn't completed his AB so he leads off next inning. If you do not want the batter to lead off the next inning you DO appeal. He thus MAY be out (if the call is changed to strike) and if so he has completed his AB so he does not lead off next inning. |
Valid Appeal flamed
Well, a valid appeal for an advantageous 4th out applies to a base running mistake. A check swing appeal is simply acknowledging that the 3rd out was made before the 4th.
|
Quote:
It's not exclusive to a baserunning mistake. (See the FED interp previously posted) |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37pm. |