![]() |
2 strike 2 outs
With a runner on first 2 strikes and 2 outs the batter checks his swing. R1 is running and thrown out. Do you allow the deffenese to ask for help on the check swing?
|
The Long Answer
Yes.
|
Yes. This could allow the defense an advantageous fourth out by preventing the batter from coming up the next inning.
|
Quote:
|
A better question is why would they? The inning is over, unless i'm missing something.
|
I agree with everyone here, its great stratagy on the defense to get the batter out and keep him from coming up first the next inning.
|
Quote:
|
From a coaching perspective - Who is the batter? Maybe he's a "sure" out and I'd be happy to see him leading off the next inning.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But then the question was why wouldn't one ask. |
Quote:
We clearly agree that the defense might or might not have a reason to ask! |
Do not allow the appeal
The defense made a play. The defense will not have a choice.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
SITUATION 20: Two outs, R3 at second base. On a 1-2 pitch, R3 attempts to steal third base as the batter attempts to check his swing. R3 is thrown out at third base for the third out. The defense now wants to appeal the check-swing on B4 so that if he went around, he struck out and would not come back to bat in the next half-inning. U1 checks with the base umpire and U2 confirms that B4 did indeed swing at strike three. RULING: Since B4’s out is a “fourth” out, the defense may select the out which is most to its advantage. B4 is out for out No. 3 and the batter following him in the lineup will bat first in the next half-inning. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
How do they know if there has been a third out at the plate? The PU is not going to immediately go the the BU for help, as he has the responsibility of watching for possible Batter Interference on the attempt to retire the runner. It's situations like these that the 4th out comes into play. |
[layman warning]
I got to thinking about it after I posted. Between that ruling and the conversation earlier, I had it in my head that the ruling allowed the defense to choose whether the batter would/would not come up the following inning after they asked for the check-swing appeal. Now, I don't think that's the case. If the batter is called out on the strikeout after the runner is out in this situation, the defense may choose whichever out benefits them, but the batter is still out in either case and does not lead off the following inning. Am I correct? |
Quote:
|
The "choice" in this situation is the actual appeal on the swing.
|
It isn't rocket science.
If there's an opportunity for a check-swing appeal then the batter could not possibly have been called out on a strikeout. The defense has a choice as to whether or not to appeal the check-swing. SO, as a matter of tactics: If you want the batter to lead off the next inning you do NOT appeal. He thus cannot be out as he hasn't completed his AB so he leads off next inning. If you do not want the batter to lead off the next inning you DO appeal. He thus MAY be out (if the call is changed to strike) and if so he has completed his AB so he does not lead off next inning. |
Valid Appeal flamed
Well, a valid appeal for an advantageous 4th out applies to a base running mistake. A check swing appeal is simply acknowledging that the 3rd out was made before the 4th.
|
Quote:
It's not exclusive to a baserunning mistake. (See the FED interp previously posted) |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37am. |