The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   2 strike 2 outs (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/58127-2-strike-2-outs.html)

Justaguy Sat May 15, 2010 01:49pm

2 strike 2 outs
 
With a runner on first 2 strikes and 2 outs the batter checks his swing. R1 is running and thrown out. Do you allow the deffenese to ask for help on the check swing?

jkumpire Sat May 15, 2010 02:30pm

The Long Answer
 
Yes.

mbyron Sat May 15, 2010 06:30pm

Yes. This could allow the defense an advantageous fourth out by preventing the batter from coming up the next inning.

ozzy6900 Sat May 15, 2010 08:32pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Justaguy (Post 676992)
With a runner on first 2 strikes and 2 outs the batter checks his swing. R1 is running and thrown out. Do you allow the deffenese to ask for help on the check swing?

Why wouldn't you?

Stu Clary Sat May 15, 2010 11:18pm

A better question is why would they? The inning is over, unless i'm missing something.

BK47 Sun May 16, 2010 07:15am

I agree with everyone here, its great stratagy on the defense to get the batter out and keep him from coming up first the next inning.

mbyron Sun May 16, 2010 08:18am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu Clary (Post 677039)
A better question is why would they? The inning is over, unless i'm missing something.

You're missing something. See post #3: http://forum.officiating.com/basebal...tml#post677009

Rich Ives Sun May 16, 2010 09:40am

From a coaching perspective - Who is the batter? Maybe he's a "sure" out and I'd be happy to see him leading off the next inning.

mbyron Sun May 16, 2010 10:33am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Ives (Post 677063)
From a coaching perspective - Who is the batter? Maybe he's a "sure" out and I'd be happy to see him leading off the next inning.

That's not a reason to ask, it's a reason not to ask. :p

Rich Ives Sun May 16, 2010 10:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 677069)
That's not a reason to ask, it's a reason not to ask. :p

Exactly!

But then the question was why wouldn't one ask.

mbyron Sun May 16, 2010 12:14pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Ives (Post 677070)
Exactly!

But then the question was why wouldn't one ask.

I was responding to Stu Clary's question, and that was not it.

We clearly agree that the defense might or might not have a reason to ask!

SAump Sun May 16, 2010 06:27pm

Do not allow the appeal
 
The defense made a play. The defense will not have a choice.

Stu Clary Sun May 16, 2010 07:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 677049)
You're missing something. See post #3: http://forum.officiating.com/basebal...tml#post677009

Ah-ha! Thank you.

asdf Sun May 16, 2010 08:37pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAump (Post 677110)
The defense made a play. The defense will not have a choice.

Not according to FED interpretations..........

SITUATION 20: Two outs, R3 at second base. On a 1-2 pitch, R3 attempts to steal third base as the batter attempts to check his swing. R3 is thrown out at third base for the third out. The defense now wants to appeal the check-swing on B4 so that if he went around, he struck out and would not come back to bat in the next half-inning. U1 checks with the base umpire and U2 confirms that B4 did indeed swing at strike three. RULING: Since B4’s out is a “fourth” out, the defense may select the out which is most to its advantage. B4 is out for out No. 3 and the batter following him in the lineup will bat first in the next half-inning.

DG Sun May 16, 2010 08:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by asdf (Post 677118)
Not according to FED interpretations..........

SITUATION 20: Two outs, R3 at second base. On a 1-2 pitch, R3 attempts to steal third base as the batter attempts to check his swing. R3 is thrown out at third base for the third out. The defense now wants to appeal the check-swing on B4 so that if he went around, he struck out and would not come back to bat in the next half-inning. U1 checks with the base umpire and U2 confirms that B4 did indeed swing at strike three. RULING: Since B4’s out is a “fourth” out, the defense may select the out which is most to its advantage. B4 is out for out No. 3 and the batter following him in the lineup will bat first in the next half-inning.

Actually on the check swing appeal the batter is the 3rd out and the throw unnecessary. But I would expect any good catcher to make the throw because he does not know what the result of the appeal will be.

Altor Sun May 16, 2010 09:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by asdf (Post 677118)
RULING: Since B4’s out is a “fourth” out, the defense may select the out which is most to its advantage.[/I]

Eww. I dislike that wording. If the batter is out on the appeal, then he should be the third out...period. The defense should decide whether they want that out before they ask about the check swing.

asdf Sun May 16, 2010 09:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG (Post 677120)
Actually on the check swing appeal the batter is the 3rd out and the throw unnecessary. But I would expect any good catcher to make the throw because he does not know what the result of the appeal will be.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Altor (Post 677128)
Eww. I dislike that wording. If the batter is out on the appeal, then he should be the third out...period. The defense should decide whether they want that out before they ask about the check swing.


How do they know if there has been a third out at the plate?

The PU is not going to immediately go the the BU for help, as he has the responsibility of watching for possible Batter Interference on the attempt to retire the runner.

It's situations like these that the 4th out comes into play.

Altor Mon May 17, 2010 08:09am

[layman warning]
I got to thinking about it after I posted. Between that ruling and the conversation earlier, I had it in my head that the ruling allowed the defense to choose whether the batter would/would not come up the following inning after they asked for the check-swing appeal. Now, I don't think that's the case. If the batter is called out on the strikeout after the runner is out in this situation, the defense may choose whichever out benefits them, but the batter is still out in either case and does not lead off the following inning. Am I correct?

Forest Ump Mon May 17, 2010 08:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Altor (Post 677172)
[layman warning]
If the batter is called out on the strikeout after the runner is out in this situation, the defense may choose whichever out benefits them, but the batter is still out in either case and does not lead off the following inning. Am I correct?

No. The batter is the third out. It does not matter what happens after that. The defense does not get a choice.

asdf Mon May 17, 2010 09:20am

The "choice" in this situation is the actual appeal on the swing.

Rich Ives Mon May 17, 2010 09:20am

It isn't rocket science.

If there's an opportunity for a check-swing appeal then the batter could not possibly have been called out on a strikeout.

The defense has a choice as to whether or not to appeal the check-swing.

SO, as a matter of tactics:

If you want the batter to lead off the next inning you do NOT appeal. He thus cannot be out as he hasn't completed his AB so he leads off next inning.

If you do not want the batter to lead off the next inning you DO appeal. He thus MAY be out (if the call is changed to strike) and if so he has completed his AB so he does not lead off next inning.

SAump Mon May 17, 2010 07:38pm

Valid Appeal flamed
 
Well, a valid appeal for an advantageous 4th out applies to a base running mistake. A check swing appeal is simply acknowledging that the 3rd out was made before the 4th.

asdf Mon May 17, 2010 08:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAump (Post 677288)
Well, a valid appeal for an advantageous 4th out applies to a base running mistake. A check swing appeal is simply acknowledging that the 3rd out was made before the 4th.

A 4th out is a 4th out.

It's not exclusive to a baserunning mistake. (See the FED interp previously posted)

DG Mon May 17, 2010 09:54pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forest Ump (Post 677181)
No. The batter is the third out. It does not matter what happens after that. The defense does not get a choice.

Of course they do. Defense can let the play stand (batter is late in the lineup) and not appeal, or they can appeal (3rd or 4th batter at the plate). If they appeal with #9 at the plate that is just not smart.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1