![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I honestly don't believe that is the correct interpretation under FED rules. The FED rule is the same as the OBR rule with one MAJOR exception. Under OBR, the defense is only "protected" for the attempt to catch a throw at 1st base. If the defense fails to make a quality throw, even if the BR is illegally in the "throwing lane", it is simply "E2" (or whatever) and the defense is afforded no protection. Under FED, the fielder receiving the throw at 1B is similarly protected, but the fielder making the throw is ALSO protected if the BR is in his throwing lane and illegally outside his running lane. If both conditions are met, AND the throwing fielder throws errantly, the BR is guilty of running lane interference. If the BR is out of the lane but NOT in the fielder's throwing lane, it's tough noogies for the defense. I believe that is what the FED rule says. JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LBR/OBS Interpretation | mcrowder | Softball | 19 | Mon Feb 13, 2006 03:18pm |
| Interpretation. | WinterWillie | Basketball | 22 | Thu Dec 01, 2005 02:55pm |
| DPI Interpretation | ljudge | Football | 15 | Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:43am |
| Need an interpretation | Grant | Basketball | 17 | Fri Feb 20, 2004 09:46am |
| FED interpretation | David Emerling | Baseball | 2 | Thu Feb 06, 2003 08:03am |