|
|||
little league interference by batter
This is a play that happened in a minors little league game, and I don't understand what the rule is -- the ump we had was very good and clearly knowledgeable, so I assume he got it right.
Right handed batter, runner at second. C drops the pitch, and runner goes. Batter stays in the box, catcher tries to throw, but batter is in way. Tries to get around batter, finally throws, too late. If the batter was not in the way, the throw probably would have been in time to get the out. (It's minors --probably always comes with a few grains of salt . . . .) What's the rule on this play? Does the batter have any obligation to get out of the way? Or is it only a problem if the batter intentionally does something to get *in* the way? I'd like to understand this rule so I can explain to batters what they need to do and to the catchers on what they can expect. thx |
|
|||
The batter cannot be expected to disappear. Standing in the box is a good place to be. However, just because he's standing still in the box does not exclude him from INT. If he has ample time to realize the play and get out of the way, standing there not moving becomes INT.
It boils down to umpire's judgment on whether he had time to react to the play, if he's standing in the box. 9 times out of 10 he'll be OK. It's a pretty simple rule, but it's judgment on whether or not it's viloated. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Batter interference | NickG | Baseball | 8 | Sat Jun 17, 2006 02:54pm |
Batter interference | DownTownTonyBrown | Baseball | 5 | Thu Oct 02, 2003 09:28pm |
batter interference? | davekoch | Baseball | 8 | Wed Oct 16, 2002 05:31pm |
Batter interference.....7-3-5a not 7-3-5c | spots101 | Baseball | 4 | Sun Sep 22, 2002 05:21pm |
Little League On Deck Batter | Ump20 | Baseball | 16 | Fri Jan 18, 2002 06:24pm |