The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 12, 2010, 02:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West of Atlanta, GA
Posts: 381
I think it was a close one. I think it was ruled that McCann hit the bat, not the bat hit him.

If that is it, it sounds like "weak INT" doesn't apply since the interpretation seems to say the bat has to hit the catcher which doesn't appear to be the case.
__________________
Question everything until you get an irrefutable or understandable answer...Don't settle for "That's Just the Way it is"
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 12, 2010, 06:52pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post

Interesting theory (a la 6.05(h) ), but I don't think I buy it. Because it would give the batter license to "hold" his follow through in a way designed to hinder the catcher's ability to throw.

I found a video clip on mlb.com and I definitely would have called it backswing interference.

Two things you can't buy. Experience and good judgment.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fake FG Giants/Skins TussAgee11 Football 2 Tue Dec 22, 2009 05:22pm
Redskins - Giants BktBallRef Football 7 Wed Sep 16, 2009 07:28pm
Braves/Marlins Play Peruvian Baseball 7 Tue Jun 28, 2005 08:24am
Giants - Redskins PeteBooth Football 2 Thu Jan 11, 2001 05:05pm
Giants got chewed up, but.... chris s Baseball 0 Mon Oct 09, 2000 08:26pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1