|
|
|
Sat Mar 13, 2010, 01:28am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Our SRI is unaware of any new interpretation removing judgment from running lane interference.
The sole 2010 NFHS Interp. dealing with RLI clarifies that there must be a throw for there to be INT, and the throw need not hit the runner. It doesn't say ANY throw causes a violation. If that were true, it would be a rules change (the 2nd clause of 8-4-1-g-1 would need to be deleted), and there were no changes to that rule for 2010. I am comfortable calling it the same way I have been calling it. 
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Batter Hit By Throw while running out of three foot zone. | LeeBallanfant | Baseball | 27 | Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:22pm |
| Three-foot running lane question. | kfo9494 | Softball | 4 | Wed Jan 21, 2009 05:12pm |
| ASA 3-foot running lane | SRW | Softball | 9 | Tue Feb 19, 2008 04:38pm |
| 3 foot lane | benbret | Softball | 17 | Thu Apr 06, 2006 01:25pm |
| Three Foot Running Lane | batterup | Baseball | 5 | Wed Jun 06, 2001 10:06am |
Hybrid Mode
