The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #106 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 19, 2009, 03:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrUmpire View Post
I can see where I was a bit unclear...my point is that FED does not eforce their requirements and, the last I knew, did not conduct random tests of any of the various manufacturer's products. They are primarily interested in the revenue generated by selling the rights to their logo and are minimally, if at all, interested in the quality of items that bear that logo.
And that makes them just like most American businesses and corporations.

[I know, the truth again; I'm sorry in advance]
  #107 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 19, 2009, 04:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrUmpire View Post
I can see where I was a bit unclear...my point is that FED does not eforce their requirements and, the last I knew, did not conduct random tests of any of the various manufacturer's products. They are primarily interested in the revenue generated by selling the rights to their logo and are minimally, if at all, interested in the quality of items that bear that logo.
MrUmpire,

No, you were perfectly clear. My response was intended to support your assertion.

A friend of mine who is "in the business" informed me that FED does absolutely nothing to verify that the baseballs conform to spec. They do, however, require that the vendor states that the balls conform to the specs when they apply for permission to use the "mark".

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
  #108 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 20, 2009, 08:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty View Post
And that makes them just like most American businesses and corporations.

[I know, the truth again; I'm sorry in advance]
1) You're not sorry.

2) It's your view of the truth. We get it. Now drop it.
  #109 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 20, 2009, 11:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
It's not a big deal, Bob. And my views, as you know, are reality based, and not fantasy based.
  #110 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 20, 2009, 01:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty View Post
It's not a big deal, Bob. And my views, as you know, are reality based, and not fantasy based.
I don't know what they are based on.

I do know the kind of response they (and any similar posts expressing views from either side of the political, etc. spectrum) gather. I do know that they (ditto) don't advance the art of umpiring. That's why they (ditto) are routinely deleted.

We can see that in the posts I've deleted since you posted this.
  #111 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 20, 2009, 02:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
We're all adults. So it's always a little silly when we can't have adult exchanges.

And opening the minds and eyes of umpires should advance the art of umpiring, should it not?

I suppose I should focus on things that are possible.
  #112 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 20, 2009, 03:03pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
I do know that they (ditto) don't advance the art of umpiring. That's why they (ditto) are routinely deleted.
I didn't realize that you too were a (ditto) head.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
  #113 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 22, 2009, 08:04pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Back to the topic at hand

I did some research and I came up with three manufactorer's that made FED legal baseballs. The three are Rawlings, Wilson and Diamond.

Rawlings model numbers.

R100HSNF
R100-NFHS
RNFHS

Wilson model numbers.

A1001B SST
A1010B PROSET
A1010B HS1-SST

Diamond model numbers

D1-NFHS-NY
D1-PRO-NFHS
D1-NFHS
DOL-1NFHS


These models are the only ones with the NFHS logo:

D1-NFHS-NY
D1-PRO-NFHS
D1-NFHS

The D1-NFHS-NY is the Official New York State High Baseball Coaches Association Baseball. This appears to be the only legal baseball that the State of New York uses. This could be why the protest in New York State was upheld.

Last edited by Steven Tyler; Sun Nov 22, 2009 at 10:00pm.
  #114 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 22, 2009, 10:13pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ View Post
In Illinois, play the game and file a report with the Illinois High School Association. They follow up with an inquiry to the respective schools.

JJ
Same in Michigan.
  #115 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 23, 2009, 12:52am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Tyler View Post
I did some research and I came up with three manufactorer's that made FED legal baseballs. The three are Rawlings, Wilson and Diamond.

Rawlings model numbers.

R100HSNF
R100-NFHS
RNFHS

Wilson model numbers.

A1001B SST
A1010B PROSET
A1010B HS1-SST

Diamond model numbers

D1-NFHS-NY
D1-PRO-NFHS
D1-NFHS
DOL-1NFHS


These models are the only ones with the NFHS logo:

D1-NFHS-NY
D1-PRO-NFHS
D1-NFHS

The D1-NFHS-NY is the Official New York State High Baseball Coaches Association Baseball. This appears to be the only legal baseball that the State of New York uses. This could be why the protest in New York State was upheld.
Well, since I know that I just did some games with Pro Nine NFHS stamped balls, and made a post stating that I did, I did a little research of my own and came up with these:



__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25

Last edited by SanDiegoSteve; Mon Nov 23, 2009 at 12:59am.
  #116 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 23, 2009, 11:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,491
Send a message via AIM to RPatrino Send a message via Yahoo to RPatrino
Nice balls, Steve.
__________________
Bob P.

-----------------------
We are stewards of baseball. Our customers aren't schools or coaches or conferences. Our customer is the game itself.
  #117 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 23, 2009, 12:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,226
...you know it's the offseason when we're having an 8 page discussion about the leagality of baseballs
  #118 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 23, 2009, 08:53pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by RPatrino View Post
Nice balls, Steve.
Thanks. I wanted to sound off like I've got a pair.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
  #119 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 23, 2009, 10:33pm
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
....I've put mine away for the season.....

JJ
  #120 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 23, 2009, 10:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
They must be brand spanking new because I can still see the stiches.

Hope your recovering nicely.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight pizanno Basketball 27 Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am
"Hideout" Play--Legal or Not? reff4e Football 10 Mon Nov 26, 2007 08:28pm
New "AP Legal Touch" Rule/Different Interpretation BayStateRef Basketball 142 Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:53pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1