The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   left foot (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/53998-left-foot.html)

asaron Fri Jul 17, 2009 02:39pm

left foot
 
Can a right handed pitcher put his left foot in rubber as to get an advantage to a pickoff at second base?

SanDiegoSteve Fri Jul 17, 2009 02:43pm

More info please. Put his foot in rubber? I can't see how that would help.:)


Provide a little more background detail.

GA Umpire Fri Jul 17, 2009 02:43pm

Not sure I follow.

Are you asking if F1 can come set with his free foot on top of the rubber?

asaron Fri Jul 17, 2009 02:48pm

Yes

jdmara Fri Jul 17, 2009 02:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by asaron (Post 615258)
Yes

This position would be considered a windup. Are you playing by FED or OBR?

-Josh

bob jenkins Fri Jul 17, 2009 02:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by asaron (Post 615252)
Can a right handed pitcher put his left foot in rubber as to get an advantage to a pickoff at second base?

A RH pitcher taking the mound with his feet in the position of a LH pitcher (left foot on rubber, right foot in front of the rubber toward home) is illegal and a balk specifically in FED.

I'd rule the same way in OBR.

GA Umpire Fri Jul 17, 2009 02:57pm

Quote:

8.01
(b) The Set Position. Set Position shall be indicated by the pitcher when he stands facing the batter with his pivot foot in contact with, and his other foot in front of, the pitcher’s plate, holding the ball in both hands in front of his body and coming to a complete stop.
It has to be in front of the plate. Not on top. However, this is a "Don't do that" issue from what I can tell.

Why would a pitcher want to do this any way?

asaron Fri Jul 17, 2009 02:57pm

left foot
 
One3 of my umpire feiends had a game and for some reason this is the position the pitcher took when there was a runner on second base. Right hand pitcher, mounted the rubber with his left foot int the hole in front of the rubber,his right foot about 15 inches towards second and attempted a pick off at second. he called a balk. was he right??

GA Umpire Fri Jul 17, 2009 03:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 615261)
A RH pitcher taking the mound with his feet in the position of a LH pitcher (left foot on rubber, right foot in front of the rubber toward home) is illegal and a balk specifically in FED.

I'd rule the same way in OBR.

If this is what you are doing, trying to deceive the runner into thinking the pitcher is LH, then that is a balk. Cannot do anything naturally associated with the pitch while on the mound and not in contact with the rubber. That is what I would rule as well. Balk.

GA Umpire Fri Jul 17, 2009 03:02pm

I don't think so. It sounds to me like the pitcher is just beginning to address the rubber when he decided to pickoff the runner.

HTBT but I don't think it should have been a balk. Maybe the pitcher just accidentally put his foot too close.

Ump Rube Fri Jul 17, 2009 03:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by asaron (Post 615265)
One3 of my umpire feiends had a game and for some reason this is the position the pitcher took when there was a runner on second base. Right hand pitcher, mounted the rubber with his left foot int the hole in front of the rubber,his right foot about 15 inches towards second and attempted a pick off at second. he called a balk. was he right??

I am not sure the I am envisioning this correctly, so let me explain what I see (in my mind). On the line down the center of the field I see:

PU
F2
HP
Edge of mound
F1's left foot "in" the rubber (hole in-front of)
Rubber
F1's right foot
2B

(Edit: F1 is still facing 3B as a righty)
If this is right, then I would say on 1st glance, that he is merely straddling the rubber, and is subject to those restrictions, but with the foot in the rubber, I see attempted deception and cause for a balk. I will have to go for further review before giving a complete answer.

GA Umpire Fri Jul 17, 2009 03:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by asaron (Post 615265)
One3 of my umpire feiends had a game and for some reason this is the position the pitcher took when there was a runner on second base. Right hand pitcher, mounted the rubber with his left foot int the hole in front of the rubber,his right foot about 15 inches towards second and attempted a pick off at second. he called a balk. was he right??

That is too obvious to be construed as deceiving the runner. If after engaging the rubber and he spins toward 2B on his free foot, I can see a balk called. If his pivot foot was much closer such as 1 or 2 inches, then he spins on his free foot. I can see a balk then.

But, to call one before he even "toes" the rubber and it is obvious to all that he is not on the rubber. I just don't see this as being a balk.

Bad mechanics maybe, but not a balk. If even going by the idea of deception, who is he deceiving? I have no balk and an out if the runner gets caught by such a bad move.

alex7 Fri Jul 17, 2009 04:20pm

earlier thread
 
This was discussed in an earlier thread on here.

With the runner at 2B, the right handed pitcher set up as a left-hander, with his left foot on the rubber. In the stretch position, he was facing 1st base, with his left foot on the rubber. No way he could pitch this way.

He then came set and picked to 2nd base.
Balk.

SanDiegoSteve Fri Jul 17, 2009 04:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by alex7 (Post 615297)
This was discussed in an earlier thread on here.

With the runner at 2B, the right handed pitcher set up as a left-hander, with his left foot on the rubber. In the stretch position, he was facing 1st base, with his left foot on the rubber. No way he could pitch this way.

He then came set and picked to 2nd base.
Balk.

Alex, he is describing the pitcher facing third base, with his left foot in the groove in front of the rubber, and his pivot foot 15 inches behind the rubber towards 2nd base. I am envisioning the pitcher just snapping a throw without any step at all, while engaged with the rubber with the wrong foot. I also think it is an illegal attempt to deceive the runner by intentionally contacting the pitcher's plate and simulating a pitching position.

cbfoulds Fri Jul 17, 2009 07:07pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ump Rube (Post 615272)
I am not sure the I am envisioning this correctly, so let me explain what I see (in my mind). On the line down the center of the field I see:

PU
F2
HP
Edge of mound
F1's left foot "in" the rubber (hole in-front of)
Rubber
F1's right foot
2B

(Edit: F1 is still facing 3B as a righty)
If this is right, then I would say on 1st glance, that he is merely straddling the rubber, and is subject to those restrictions, but with the foot in the rubber, I see attempted deception and cause for a balk. I will have to go for further review before giving a complete answer.

"Attempted deception" is NEVER "cause for a balk"!!! LOSE that idea forever.

What you have described [and i THINK what the OP describes] is F1 straddling the rubber [assuming, as you and I do, that he is facing 3d base]. Nothing sinister about that; and yes, he can attempt a pick toward 2d, without any further step or other ado, 'cause he's still an infielder and hasn't assumed a position on the rubber yet. Don't care if his free foot is "in the divot" or 12 inches in front of the rubber - no difference Rules-wise.

About that "deception": it's a balk if it violates a Rule and is deceptive: if it's deceptive and violates none of the pitching Rules, IT"S GOOD PITCHING.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1