The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 03, 2009, 12:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 396
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrm21711 View Post
Im assuming you are referring to the Titanium mask being more protective than the standard Wilson Dyna-Lite because it is more expensive. If so, I have heard NOBODY make these claims who is knowledgeable on the subject - rather that the Titanium is lighter. In fact, we recently had somebody post that their Wilson Titanium suffered a bent bar from a ~90 mph fastball.
In fact it was bent, and then the replacement that was sent to me got bent in its 2nd game, the first time it got hit by a foul ball straight back off the bat. Both have been sent back for full refund and I went back to the original West Vest with the doe skin for $90 with 2 day shipping. Ordered it Saturday and got it yesterday afternoon from Joe West's Site.

If a $90 mask bends after the 1st time it gets hit, that is 1 thing, but if a $270 mask, after tax and doe skin pads, bends after the first hit on 2 different masks, well then I have a problem with that.

I love the feel, look and vision of the titanium, but I usually get hit about 10 times a season in the mask, and if each one absorbes instaed of deflects the blow, then my mask will look like rolling plaines by the end of the season.

When wilson fixxes the design issues that I feel they have with their product I will gladly buy a new one regardless of the cost.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 03, 2009, 12:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
That says it all.

I can't say I'm thinking about it when the game's going, but I have a much different feeling about its indestructibility in general. It's still the lightest, most comfortable, highest visibility mask there is. And that is the benefit you gain the 99 percent of the time you're not getting a mask shot. But if it can dent, it can eventually crack, I suppose. And I wear very expensive glasses and I can ill-afford to damage them ... or my face.

I have a little-used WV doeskin mask that I retired when the titanium came out. I always bring it along to the games just in case. Now I have a solid reason.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 03, 2009, 02:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Great State of North Carolina
Posts: 170
I use the Wilson Dyna-Lite single bar mask with the doe skin wrap around pads. I absolutely love it. Light, sturdy protection and looks good. I like the look of the titanium, but am just not willing to shell out the big bucks for it based on looks alone while my Dyna-Lite is still in good condition.
__________________
Warren
www.umpire-empire.com
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 03, 2009, 02:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
It isn't for the looks alone. It is the ultimate in comfort. I have the other mask you just described. It is comfortable. It is not even close to the comfort level of the titanium. Not close. And that doesn't even address the increased visibility of the titanium.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 03, 2009, 05:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 387
One thing I like very much about the new light Diamond mask is the bar design. Instead of round they use a flat, deep bar that so far appears much more resistant to bending.

Have two partners with this mask and have seen both take 90+ shots with zero damage (other than a chin bruise for one as he was too cheap to order wrap around pads at 1st, now fixed).
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 03, 2009, 06:19pm
cc6 cc6 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Why would you say that? I'm "sure" that some of the masks are the models the professional umpires use, and I'm "sure" that professional umpires' masks get dented over the course of a season.
Will one dent not reduce the visibility and safety of the mask, basically rendering it garbage? The mask might be safe before it takes a hit, but if it only lasts one dent then you'd be going through a lot of masks.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 03, 2009, 09:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by cc6 View Post
Will one dent not reduce the visibility and safety of the mask, basically rendering it garbage?
Not necessarily. There are too many variables for a yes or no answer.

Quote:
The mask might be safe before it takes a hit, but if it only lasts one dent then you'd be going through a lot of masks.

If you need to wear a mask that will never dent, you won't be umpiring. It doesn't exist.

Be thankful those little tykes you work can't throw very hard yet.

Last edited by MrUmpire; Tue Mar 03, 2009 at 09:29pm.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 07, 2009, 09:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
About that Dent

Reason lighter masks gained popularity was that they were as hard as steel.
All new mask brands may dent. That's one crazy statement.
It may tie for the dumbest one this month.
CC6 is on the money here.
Time for a new mask.
__________________
SAump

Last edited by SAump; Sat Mar 07, 2009 at 09:27pm.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 07, 2009, 09:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
Correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by cc6 View Post
Will one dent not reduce the visibility and safety of the mask, basically rendering it garbage? The mask might be safe before it takes a hit, but if it only lasts one dent then you'd be going through a lot of masks.
Use sound judgment when making your next $200 purchase.
There are a number of defective masks on the market.
Avoid SUL's, New View's, or HSM's with injury record.
The verdict is still pending on the Titanium mask.
__________________
SAump
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 09, 2009, 09:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6
I use a Wilson Dynal-Lite mask (blk) with tan doe-skin wrap around pads (very protective). For $89 its a great buy for what I truly feel is excellent protection. I would love to purchase a titanium mask and probably will. I would love to see and try one on. But even though its pricey, as a uniform/equipment fanatic, i fell compelled to give it a look. It may just become my one and only, as so many have said before me. Balls and strikes baby!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 09, 2009, 09:58am
cc6 cc6 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAump View Post
Use sound judgment when making your next $200 purchase.
There are a number of defective masks on the market.
Avoid SUL's, New View's, or HSM's with injury record.
The verdict is still pending on the Titanium mask.
The only time I would use an HSM is if there was some sort of overhang that jutted out from the backstop, and I needed to avoid getting hit on the head. Other than that, the HSM seems like a waste of money.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 09, 2009, 10:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
What?
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 09, 2009, 10:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by cc6 View Post
Other than that, the HSM seems like a waste of money.
I get why some like the HSM. It does offer better visibility, no doubt. Others like its comfort, and some dig it because they don't have to wear a hat. Still others like the Monroe-matics attached to the cage, that absorb the shock. It may seem like a waste of $ to you, but I don't begrudge others for making the investment.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 09, 2009, 01:59pm
cc6 cc6 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by kylejt View Post
I get why some like the HSM. It does offer better visibility, no doubt. Others like its comfort, and some dig it because they don't have to wear a hat. Still others like the Monroe-matics attached to the cage, that absorb the shock. It may seem like a waste of $ to you, but I don't begrudge others for making the investment.
I wouldn't begrude others for buying one. Just saying it's not for me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For The MLB Umpire Junkies Blue37 Baseball 5 Fri May 25, 2007 07:57am
For all you bracket junkies out there . . . Mark Dexter Basketball 0 Mon May 03, 2004 10:35am
Equipment Bill Baker Softball 2 Tue Jan 07, 2003 01:07pm
ISP for basketball junkies leecooper Basketball 4 Thu Dec 05, 2002 08:40am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1