The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 07, 2008, 09:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 131
NFHS Supplemental Publications

Looking for opinions here. How useful are the Rules by Topic and Simplified & Illustrated Rules books (NFHS rules only)? I'm looking for a little more education than what I get with the rulebooks, and was wondering if these are helpful.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 07, 2008, 09:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 338
I thought the Rules by Topic is great. I breaks the rule down and gives you caseplays......oh wait its kind of the big brother of the case book.
__________________
"My greatest fear is that when I die, my wife will sell my golf clubs for what I told her I paid for them."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 08, 2008, 11:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
Agreed. It gets you focused on the rules that you are most likely to need.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 10:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 18
Both books are excellent! Simplified and Illustrated helps with the coaches who cannot or will not read the rule book. I tell them to read the comic book version and they enjoy it and it makes our job easier.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 11:13am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
The comic book version ...

The one knock I was going to make on the illustrated one is the hoaky pictures.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 02:37pm
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,047
There is only one glaring error in the Simplified & Illustrated Rules Book and that it says that it is a balk for F1 to stand in front of the pitcher's plate take a sign from F2. We all know that there is no such prohibition. The only requirement is that F1 shall take or simulate taking a signal after intentionally contacting the pitcher's plate.

MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 02:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. View Post
There is only one glaring error in the Simplified & Illustrated Rules Book and that it says that it is a balk for F1 to stand in front of the pitcher's plate take a sign from F2. We all know that there is no such prohibition. The only requirement is that F1 shall take or simulate taking a signal after intentionally contacting the pitcher's plate.

MTD, Sr.
Do you have any proof to back up this assertion? Anything from NFHS? I need more than an individual's word before I will ignore a publication authorize by NFHS.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 03:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 131
I'm thinking MTD is referring to this thread here:

NFHS Forum: takes the signal from the catcher

It's about 300 posts deep, so pace yourself while reading
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 04:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by aschramm View Post
I'm thinking MTD is referring to this thread here:

NFHS Forum: takes the signal from the catcher

It's about 300 posts deep, so pace yourself while reading
The NHFS Forum is one of the most screwed up places to try and get answers to FED rules. It if filled with so called "know it alls" that haven't got a clue when it comes to FED. Just go down the above link about 30 posts and you will see for yourself. It's a shame because, it once was a pretty good forum.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 15, 2008, 09:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 381
Boy, I wish I had seen Ozzy's post before I followed aschramm's link. I'll never get that time back.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jaksa/Roder Rules Publications??? shawnoilers Baseball 4 Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:06am
2007-08 NFHS Supplemental Rules Interpreations: SITUATION 10. Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Basketball 61 Thu Aug 07, 2008 05:04pm
NFHS Online Publications WhistlesAndStripes Basketball 2 Wed Dec 19, 2007 04:36pm
Umpire Publications...Thoughts? mrm21711 Baseball 4 Sat Oct 23, 2004 07:14pm
Jim Evans Publications shawnoilers Baseball 1 Mon Mar 22, 2004 03:27pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1