Ranergs vs The Evil Empire

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by jwwashburn

Ok, I do know how to spell RANGERS!

Unfortunately, you don't know how to spell Cano though.....

just saying....

[jwwashburn]

I couldn't care less how to spell Cnnooee...He is a Douche.

[SAump]

The "get-it-right" attitudes prevail.
As good or better than a "do-ever" for the moment.

[mbyron]

Yes, MLB wants the umpires to get it right. They did, fixed the other runners in a sensible way, nobody was ejected. Nice work. And they didn't need replay.

[jwwashburn]

But, my question is this: If Cano had turned two...could the Rangers skipper have argued to change it to a catch?

[johnnyg08]

I don't see why not...if he can argue one, why not the other?

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by jwwashburn

I couldn't care less how to spell Cnnooee...He is a Douche.

He's a Canouche!

[johnnyg08]

one might say that a coach can pretty much argue whatever he wants...there are some consequences for arguing certain things...but he can argue whatever he wishes.

[Nigel Tufnel]

I have never done 4-man, but I think that a quick glance to your partner at first(who probably had the better angle, and who wasn't moving at the time of the catch/no catch) could have squelched this whole mess...

We use this in 2 and 3 man. Is this verbotten at the ML level?