![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
I'm with you guys, I wasn't in position to see the call so couldn't help. But it got me thinking with all the "if they ask, you gotta appeal for help whether you want to or not" posts on the check swing. What is so different here.
On the check swing OP, my partner was in B and not really in position there either to rule on a non-check that I knew I had not missed (it wasn't close to being a swing). That coach was being a rat by trying to force the issue and not accepting my explanation that partner wasn't in position to make a ruling. But doesn't the same philosophy apply here too? If you aren't in position to rule and the coach still asks, do you still have to go to your partner? Don't want to sound argumentative, just looking for guidance - |
|
|||
|
Fritz - I believe that the argument may come down to the fact that partner in B has a better look at a check swing then the home plate umpire.
I'm not going to argue that BU in B or even C gets a good enough look on a check swing, even good enough to overrule PU at times. Any umpire that is worth a damn can get a decent to good look at a check swing in B or C. I just hope that BU doesn't "get a strike back" that PU KNEW wasn't there to begin with... Those who participate in schools... is the idea of PU taking the strike call right away being emphasized more? Or does it just seem that at the MLB level the plate umpire is getting more strikes on those check swings rather than balling the pitch and then appealing? |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Walt - I don't know why I've struck a chord.
I've said if PU was unsure if the batter swung, then he should always get help. I do not agree that it is a good idea to ask for an appeal to another umpire when the original, calling umpire knew he was right. We wouldn't do it in any other sitch, but the rules say we do it in this one. Why? I'm still not sure. It has nothing to do with my ego or manhood being challenged as PU. If I think my partner may have information I didn't have, I'm always glad to get it. I don't see how all check swings fit this bill though. I'll fade into the sunset, we're just talking in circles. |
|
|||
|
Fritz, how far up the 3b line where you? You should be no more than 3/4 up the line, as the ball and runner never arrived at 3b. If you were in the cut-out you were wrong. You should be drifting back toward the plate. Your responsibility was R2's advance on the tag, not a second throw in the infield. The BU needs to get both sides of that play.
__________________
Bob P. ----------------------- We are stewards of baseball. Our customers aren't schools or coaches or conferences. Our customer is the game itself. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
2) Sometimes what a plate umpire "knows for certain" isn't what happened. 3) I've "never" had a coach ask to check if there wasn't some movement of the bat. If coaches are being a PITA about asking, then deal with that. 4) The time spent denying the request and then explaining it is longer thatn the time to check. 5) By tradition, if you don't check, you get the chit. If you ask, BU gets the chit (no matter the call). |
|
|||
|
Regarding seeing things from B or C...
2 weekends ago, top of the 1st in a AAU DH. Lefty pitcher starts towards home then comes to first. I get the balk. Coach yells something from dugout, I ignore. Then coach comes out to about 5-10 feet away from me... and says "How can you see that from there?" I said back "Somebody has to!" Coach retreated back in pretty quickly. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Don't guess, don't play games, just make the calls. Thanks David |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Really new partner | fullor30 | Basketball | 6 | Sun Nov 25, 2007 09:35pm |
| What a Partner! | refnrev | Volleyball | 2 | Tue Feb 06, 2007 05:33pm |
| How do tell your partner??? | MidMadness | Basketball | 27 | Tue Nov 07, 2006 12:15am |
| Look At Your Partner(s)!!!!!! | refnrev | Soccer | 4 | Thu Sep 07, 2006 01:26pm |
| Tell Partner! | DJ | Basketball | 18 | Tue Mar 09, 2004 03:31pm |