|
I always face the plate. I do not take a peak at anything other than the pitcher and who has the ball. The minute I peak, I will lose a view as to what happen. I will look around if fielders are moving, but that is before the pitcher takes the rubber and usually when nothing is going on.
Peace |
When I'm in B with R1 I'm chest up to the 45' line and in middle to short B.
In this position I can look 45deg. (not over my shoulder) at F1 and all the action on the mound as well as home plate and also with just a move of the head (again, without having to look over my shoulder) see the pickoff at first. The pickoff at first sometimes can be very quick and I don't want to be moving during the tag nor do I want to be looking over my shoulder. For me, hands on my knees, very stable and just a turn of the head in short to middle B gives me a great angle and a steady look. |
Quote:
FYI. That would be contrary to "best practices" as described in the PBUC "red Book" and what is taught at Evans' schools. JM |
Quote:
Damn, all that time and money spent and I was taught wrong at school. |
Quote:
That's why I'm not turning my head to glance at a runner I can hear if he advances. I see no reason to glance and I am seldom caught off guard. I understand and have read the PBUC Red Book mechanics regarding glancing. I do not glance. When I am in B or C, I am closer to everyone on the field to the ball with the exception of the pitcher. I have ears. I have no reason to glance at a runner I can hear. At my age, I am going to watch the ball. Absolutely nothing is going to happen that requires my attention without the ball. |
It's hard to watch for a foul at the plate, hit batsman, checkswings, balks, etc if you are staring into the dugout.
|
Quote:
I've never had any evaluations mention it. I would like to know however what the cons of my approach are and the benefits of the best practices. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I don't see how the pros of checking over the shoulder at R2 outweigh the cons, especially in two man. You're not going to go to towards the 45 foot line until the pitch hits the mitt anyways, so it really does you no extra good to know that R2 is stealing (unless you are caught sleeping, which is a different story that shouldn't happen).
If you peak, you find out he's going, then stand in the same spot until the ball reaches the mitt. If you don't peak, you don't know he's going, but find out when you hear defense yelling, see F5 moving over out of the corner of your eye, hear footsteps behind you, and even if you don't know after all that, the catcher standing up to throw should be a hint (if you've waited this long, yes, you have lost a step or two). But, if you peak, you are compromising a check swing appeal, a foul ball off the foot, a balk (granted, not if done correctly), maybe even picking up a ball in play late because of eye movement as your head swivels back. This all being said, if I was told to look at R2 at school, I wouldn't say boo about it. But if I was writing the Bible of Umpiring, I would say don't do it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Save your ink. |
Quote:
If you're so insecure in your abilities as an umpire that you have to peak at R1 or R2, you have more serious issues. JMHO |
Quote:
|
Quote:
JEAPU - PBUC sez peek, ya peek (at R2). I paid $4000 for that tidbit, I'm gonna get my money's worth. I never understood why guys couldn't just step and turn toward first to see the throw, or the need to show your profile to home plate. I don't agree to disagree. You're wrong. You can disagree if you want, but you're still wrong. That's what people say without admitting they're wrong. As Rut says, "Peace" |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11pm. |