The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 29, 2008, 06:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Wow! I guess that I must be doing it all wrong because I go to my partner when asked on a checked swing. I must also be wrong for going to my partner when the batter has 2 strikes and checks his swing and the catcher can't handle the pitch.

But you know what? I don't catch any crap from the coaches or the players and I get very few arguments. And seeing as how this is what is taught in the schools and clinics here in the USA, I'll just stick with this procedure. If I ever officiate North of the boarder, I'll be sure to go to a clinic, eh?
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 29, 2008, 06:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
Ozzy - make sure to be ready to ignore 150 years of tried and true mechanics...
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 29, 2008, 06:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 543
Well guys, I never suggested throwing out 150 years of umpiring mechanics. All I'm saying is that I can see the swing/no swing just fine from my position behind the plate. Maybe it's my stance, or distance from the catcher. Whatever the case, I won't hesitate to appeal to my partner if asked to do so by the catcher.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 29, 2008, 09:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Quote:
Originally Posted by canadaump6
Actually LittleMan, you appear to be the only troll here.

On any pitch, whether it be curves, sliders, or fastballs, I can see both the ball itself as well as the batter's arms, wrists and bat if he makes a check swing. It's one of those calls I feel a plate umpire should not miss in the first place.
By this statement you're also saying that you've never felt the need to call a strike when an appeal was requested by your PU. Or, for that matter, that you've never had a strike called when you appealed to your partner when you were behind the plate.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 29, 2008, 11:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,491
Send a message via AIM to RPatrino Send a message via Yahoo to RPatrino
Canada, your ability to see every check swing regardless of type of pitch or its location is probably more due to your failure to track the pitch all the way to the catchers glove and use good timing to make your call.

In some situations your attention should be completely focused on the pitch and catchers glove watching him catch the pitch, particularly balls that are low, or in fact even bounce.
__________________
Bob P.

-----------------------
We are stewards of baseball. Our customers aren't schools or coaches or conferences. Our customer is the game itself.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 30, 2008, 12:01am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by canadaump6
Well guys, I never suggested throwing out 150 years of umpiring mechanics. All I'm saying is that I can see the swing/no swing just fine from my position behind the plate. Maybe it's my stance, or distance from the catcher. Whatever the case, I won't hesitate to appeal to my partner if asked to do so by the catcher.
Sometimes the reason we do not see the swing is because the catcher does something they should not be doing. Ability has little to do with it.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 30, 2008, 12:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 94
Send a message via Yahoo to danreeves1973
please correct me i I am wrong, but have there not been studies done and it been shown scientifically that BU in the B position has a better view to call on a check swing than the PU? I swear I have read that either on this forum or on a link from this forum to the research. Thus not asking for help shows....arrogance and ignorance in the face of science?

Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 30, 2008, 01:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 543
Thanks for the tips guys. I never really was sure what the reason was for the checked swing appeal. Now it is more clear.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 30, 2008, 01:53am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by canadaump6
On any pitch, whether it be curves, sliders, or fastballs, I can see both the ball itself as well as the batter's arms, wrists and bat if he makes a check swing. It's one of those calls I feel a plate umpire should not miss in the first place.
1) Nobody called you a troll, so why the hostility?

2) You shouldn't be calling names. You don't like it when people call you names. I know, because I've read where you made it clear that you don't like being called names.

3) Adios my friend is a euphamism meaning "adios mother ******." Again, nobody was telling any "inside jokes, or referring to you in any way. Paranoia will destroy ya!

4) I agree that the PU should get all the check swing calls himself if possible. Sometimes you can't tell, like when the catcher bounces up and screens you out while you are busy tracking the pitch. But the PU should always strive to get the check swing calls himself. But there is nothing to gain by refusing a coach or catcher to ask for help. I hate when a catcher or coach wants me to go for help, especially when I know damn well the batter checked his swing. But as much as it irritates me, it doesn't pay to be beligerent and refuse to ask for help. I just go ahead and ask like I'm supposed to and try not to let my irritation show (not always possible).
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25

Last edited by bob jenkins; Fri May 30, 2008 at 06:48am.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 30, 2008, 02:26am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
I hate when a catcher or coach wants me to go for help, especially when I know damn well the batter checked his swing. But as much as it irritates me, it doesn't pay to be beligerent and refuse to ask for help. I just go ahead and ask like I'm supposed to and try not to let my irritation show (not always possible).
I have no problem refusing a ridiculous request. You know the barely take the bat off their shoulder flinch that gets a request. At least under NF Rules it is not an obligation for a PU to ask for a check swing and I adhere to that when necessary. I do not give a rat's “patoot” what the coaches think. I have no problem asking for help if the bat is clearly out there, but not when the request is bogus. NCAA is a different story and is required by the rules.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 30, 2008, 09:41am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
I have no problem refusing a ridiculous request. You know the barely take the bat off their shoulder flinch that gets a request. At least under NF Rules it is not an obligation for a PU to ask for a check swing and I adhere to that when necessary. I do not give a rat's “patoot” what the coaches think. I have no problem asking for help if the bat is clearly out there, but not when the request is bogus. NCAA is a different story and is required by the rules.

Peace
I save my annoyances for other situations. I always check with my partner when asked in any game and inside I jump with glee when a partner hands me another strike.

I remember working a game with a crusty old vet back in the early 90s. I was in C and a RH batter clearly offered. FED game. PU refused to come to me and I stood there in C and watched it escalate to an ejection. And another. And a third. Well, I stopped just watching after the first one, but you get the idea.

After the game, I told him that the batter offered. He told me that I can't see that from there. I scratched him that evening.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 30, 2008, 10:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
I can't see any vaild reason not to go to your partner, because it isn't that you didn't rule on the pitch in the first place....you (PU) called it a ball already. Ball calls are detrimental to our desired game outcome.

Appealing can only benefit the PU: He can a) get another strike, and b) if there is any anger about the change, it goes to the BU, not him. No downside here.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When the obvious call isn't the right call Don Mueller Baseball 28 Mon Aug 20, 2007 01:46am
The right call or the correct call? Nevadaref Basketball 9 Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:21am
ASA OBS call then no call leads to ejection DaveASA/FED Softball 28 Mon Jul 12, 2004 03:52pm
To call or not to call foul ball DaveASA/FED Softball 11 Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:47am
More Pacers/Pistons call/no call OverAndBack Basketball 36 Thu Jun 03, 2004 07:01pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:43am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1