I, too, like that interpretation. I hereby declare this as an
OFFICIAL INTERPRETATION! Somehow, I don't think I have the clout to utter that phrase.
Quote:
Originally posted by Roger Greene
Bob,
Are you saying that if the accidental appeal is part of continuing action on the original play to recognize it, and if the accidental appeal is on a subsequent play, to require that it be unmistakable?
Interesting concept. And it would solve some (but not all) of the problems with the accidental appeal.
Do we have any supporting rulings?
Roger Greene
[Edited by Roger Greene on Mar 22nd, 2002 at 12:26 PM]
|
Fri Mar 22, 2002, 01:27pm
Threaded Mode
