The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 1.00 average. Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 13, 2008, 11:23pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock
If the AT said he was not fit for play, I'd take his word for it. In this case, he's an expert.
This I would agree with. But it's not a 2 way street -- I would not allow the player back in without the written authorization from the doctor.

Horse beaten.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 14, 2008, 08:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartee14
I agree with you that an Athletic Trainer is not an MD or DO. But, they do have to work under the direction of an MD or DO. So, trust me, they know what they are doing. Athletic Trainer's have to go through 4 years of college and then pass a National Board test. My point being, as an umpire, it is not my job to tell whether the player was unconscious, it is a medical professional. In this case, the medical professional is the Athletic Trainer. This is another case of an official thinking they are more important then they really are.
I totally disagree

This has nothing to do with an official thinking they are more important then the game. It is the case of an official KNOWING and FOLLOWING the rules.

Regardless of what you think the rules DO NOT say Athletic Trainer. They say from a physician (MD/DO).

This is an amateur baseball game and the team "can live' without this player for the remainder of the game.

Remember it's a GAME

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 14, 2008, 03:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 230
How would you guys handle the situation? Personally I would tell the coach when he gives me his replacement right after the injury so both the coach and the ATC know that he is not coming back unless there is a note from an MD. From the original post it sounded as if the umpire stayed silent on the situation, thus creating the confusion.

In Ontario we do have a similar procedure in place, however it is enforced by the school staff as it calls for the athlete not to participate in any activity until cleared. Activity means practice and/or game and the athlete sits out until cleared not just for the day.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 17, 2008, 04:21pm
ODJ ODJ is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartee14
I would have said the same thing. The ATC would then have to take that up with the powers to be.

But, my 2 cents. We are umpires. At the end of the day, whether we are doctors, lawyers, teachers, etc, when we are on the field, WE ARE UMPIRES. WE ARE NOT DOCTORS, ATHLETIC TRAINERS, etc. If you have a Certified Athletic Trainer at the game, you need to let them make the decisions. Who am I to tell an ATC that the player who just got hit should not return to the game? That is not my call. That is his/her call. That is what they get paid for. Unless you see the athlete laying there unconscious and they have to do CPR or mouth to mouth breathing, there is no reason not to let them return. I think the umpire made the wrong call.
An AT is NOT an MD/OD. Give me the official letterhead from an MD that says the kid can play.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 19, 2008, 01:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 561
Send a message via AIM to BoomerSooner
I know I'm late into the discussion, but I agree with the general concept that the rule should be followed to the letter. Loss of consciousness = signed release from MD/DO.

What I don't agree with, however, is some the posters that have implied that any signs, symptoms, or similarities to a head injury require a doctor's release. I understand the concept of better safe than sorry, but just because a kid takes a pitch to the head and takes a second to get up doesn't mean he was unconscious. Just because a kid takes a pitch has a knot on his forehead, doesn't mean there is a loss of consciousness. I'm sorry, but for all the preaching about following the letter of the law, there seem to be alot of posters that want to declare a kid unconscious just to be safe rather than because he was actually unconscious. This is just my interpretation of what others are saying. If we are going to play the better safe than sorry angle then shouldn't we be requiring full neuroloical work-ups including EEG, CT scans, etc? The purpose of the rule is to protect the kids, not the umpires.
__________________
My job is a decision-making job, and as a result, I make a lot of decisions." --George W. Bush
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 21, 2008, 04:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by waltjp
  • Appears dazed or stunned
  • Is confused about assignment
  • Forgets plays
  • Is unsure of game, score, or opponent
  • Moves clumsily
  • Answers questions slowly
  • Loses consciousness
  • Shows behavior or personality changes
  • Can't recall events prior to hit
  • Can't recall events after hit
Or the athlete himself might report the following symptoms if he has a concussion, including a:
  • Headache
  • Nausea
  • Balance problems or dizziness
  • Double or fuzzy vision
  • Sensitivity to light or noise
  • Feeling sluggish
  • Feeling foggy or groggy
  • Concentration or memory problems
  • Confusion
Other important facts about concussions include that they:
  • are caused by a bump, blow, or jolt to the head
  • can occur even if the athlete doesn't lose consciousness
  • can happen in any sport
  • may not cause symptoms until days or weeks after the injury
  • can cause brain swelling, permanent brain damage, or even death, if an athlete has a second concussion before fulling recovering from a first one

Who are you to say that the player can't play if they exhibit signs of a concussion. We can only limit return to play in the event of an apparent LOC not a concussion.

This discussion is very trying for me because I am both and umpire and an Athletic Trainer. The rule clearly states that in the event of apparent LOC then the player must have written permission/clearance from a MD. Let me tell you something, any ATC worth anything, and that has any clue, will not allow a player to RTP if there is any thought that there was LOC. Any time I have apparent LOC with my athletes, their in the ER asap.

I think that umpires need to be aware of LOC. Reading this I'm not sure that you guys know the difference between a concussion and LOC. Dazed/Confused/Dizzy/Amnesia, all that from the list above does not equal a loss of consciousness.

I think that, and the way that I would handle this situation if there is no ATC present, is after everything calms down, as the coach and I are discussing who the replacement is, I would tell the coach that in my opinion that player had a LOC and state why that is (unresponsive, blacked out, etc). If he asks me why I feel that way, then i explain my medical experience. I truely believe that if this happens, 1. the coach doesn't try to put the kid in, and 2. he won't have a problem with me saying hey I feel this way and this is what i observed. I don't think that he needs to be told that the player cannot return unless a doc's note is present, becasue he's going to seek one out maybe. Also, it needs to be noted on the line-up cards that there was LOC and why. And if the coaches have a problem, all you have to tell them is Tough crap, let move on
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 21, 2008, 08:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Eagle_12, the chart waltjp copied was provided by the "Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention," or as you might say, DOHAHSCFDCAP, so if you have a problem with it, maybe you should take it out on them. But they probably don't know what they are talking about because they are not Athletic Trainers.

Their first recommendation in the Point of Emphasis was to "Remove athlete from play" if you SUSPECT, that a player has a concussion.

Being, just a "dumb ole umpire" and not an expert Athletic Trainer and also following the rules, I will not let a player return without a physicians written authorization if they exhibit the Signs and Symptons suggest by the Department of Health.

Finally, I really don't believe that you need to explain to a coach that because his player is "unresponsive or blacked out" that they had a loss of consciousness, and that you determined that because of your medical experience. DAH.

But being just a dumb ole umpire, who am I to say.
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 21, 2008, 09:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 70
Please show me where it says that we can limit due to a concussion, let alone a "suspected" concussion.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 21, 2008, 10:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In the Desert....
Posts: 826
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle_12
Please show me where it says that we can limit due to a concussion, let alone a "suspected" concussion.

different sport (Softball) FED rules...... Batter takes a pitch of the helmet..happens a lot..no big deal, right? well instead of going to first, she just stands there....shakes her head....and shakes it again.... I talk to her, and she doesnt respond... I tell her to look at me, and she finally looks in my direction and her eyes are unfocused.....I figured it was a concussion then, and NO WAY IN HELL was she going to continue that game. Report me, whatever. The trainer then comes up and tells me its her 3rd ONE SINCE THE start of the school year! 2 in BASKETBALL, and now this one. I told the trainer and head coach that tehre was no way she was continuing, and in my unexpert opinon, she shouldnt be playing any sports for a LONG time! (ever?)
I wrote a letter to the state association..never heard anything back..my point is...Im going to err on the side of caution...fed game, concussion= trip to the doctor, and doctors note. Period.
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 21, 2008, 11:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 605
I'm not a health care professional...and, frankly, I haven't read all the posts in this thread: I'm too tired and its too late.

However, I will add, that as an attorney, I advise all my umpire friends:

If they themselves have first-hand knowledge that a player became "apparently unconscious" OR they are told from a reliable source (i.e. a trainer, coach, etc.) that the player was unconscious...there is no friggin' way that player is coming back in the game unless I receive a note (in triplicate ) signed by a MEDICAL DOCTOR (MD). Period, end of discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 21, 2008, 11:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aurora CO
Posts: 145
This thread has gone on too long.

A. I let a player with a suspected concussion return to play

1. He may not be reinjured
2. He may be reinjured due to his decreased ability to play

a. I may not be sued.
b. I may be sued.

1. I may win the lawsuit.
2. I may be found negligent.

a. I may not lose all I own
b. I might lose my house, my car, any savings I have etc.

B. I do not allow him to play

1. The coach will agree he should not play
2. The coach and the parents will think I am an OOO.

I can live with option B.

Last edited by Mrumpiresir; Mon Apr 21, 2008 at 11:08pm.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 21, 2008, 11:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 24
Coach: "I'm bringing Johnson back in to catch. Number 4."
Umpire: "Isn't he the one who was hit in the head?"
Coach: "Yeah, our trainer checked him out. He's fine"
Umpire: "I'm not letting him in. He was hit in the head and he should sit."
Trainer: "I checked him out. I followed our shool's protocol for head injuries. I watched while he did some sit-ups and deep knee bends. It is my opinion that he is fit to play."
Umpire: "I need a note from a doctor. Until then, he sits."
Coach: "Are you saying that he was unconscious?"
Umpire: "No, I am saying that because he was hit in the head he could have a concussion, and I need a note to allow him to re-enter."
Coach: "I protest your application of 10-2-3k."
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 22, 2008, 01:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 387
Quote:
Originally Posted by t-rex
Coach: "I'm bringing Johnson back in to catch. Number 4."
Umpire: "Isn't he the one who was hit in the head?"
Coach: "Yeah, our trainer checked him out. He's fine"
Umpire: "I'm not letting him in. He was hit in the head and he should sit."
Trainer: "I checked him out. I followed our school's protocol for head injuries. I watched while he did some sit-ups and deep knee bends. It is my opinion that he is fit to play."
Umpire: "I need a note from a doctor. Until then, he sits."
Coach: "Are you saying that he was unconscious?"
Umpire: "No, I am saying that because he was hit in the head he could have a concussion, and I need a note to allow him to re-enter."
Coach: "I protest your application of 10-2-3k."
If IMO there was any chance the player suffered a concussion I can live with that and will have the full backing of our association.

I just happen to have a significant amount of training & experience (EMT, mountain rescue) and can rather easily determine the risk factors present in allowing the player to return.

My suggestion to any game official is this: weigh the risk - if you feel the player was suffered sufficient head injury that you are not comfortable with his/her return keep them out. No HS game is worth a child's future.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 22, 2008, 07:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
My suggestion to any game official is this: weigh the risk - if you feel the player was suffered sufficient head injury that you are not comfortable with his/her return keep them out. No HS game is worth a child's future.[/QUOTE]

Amen
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 22, 2008, 07:25am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by t-rex
Coach: "I'm bringing Johnson back in to catch. Number 4."
Umpire: "Isn't he the one who was hit in the head?"
Coach: "Yeah, our trainer checked him out. He's fine"
Umpire: "I'm not letting him in. He was hit in the head and he should sit."
Trainer: "I checked him out. I followed our shool's protocol for head injuries. I watched while he did some sit-ups and deep knee bends. It is my opinion that he is fit to play."
Umpire: "I need a note from a doctor. Until then, he sits."
Coach: "Are you saying that he was unconscious?"
Umpire: "No, I am saying that because he was hit in the head he could have a concussion, and I need a note to allow him to re-enter."
Coach: "I protest your application of 10-2-3k."
He appeared to momentarily lose consciousness. Play ball.

Protest that.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Automatic s-house dash_riprock Baseball 2 Tue Jan 22, 2008 07:06am
Celebratin' at my house Adam Basketball 19 Sat Dec 04, 2004 08:18am
House Rules PeteBooth Baseball 15 Tue Oct 21, 2003 08:25pm
House rules—and a coach decoy greymule Softball 5 Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:41am
When the moon is in the seventh house.... rainmaker Basketball 9 Mon Mar 26, 2001 07:29pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1