The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 1.00 average. Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2008, 11:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C
The NFHS overheads are FINALLY quite clear on this issue.

With a runner on base and F1 goes to his mouth, not mattering if it is the set or the wind-up position, it is a balk.

The rule clarification for 2008 made the going to the mouth situation simple.

If F1 is not in contact with the pitcher's plate he can go to his mouth as long as he wipes.
TEE will you do some preventative umpiring on ths issue?

In other words you see F1 do this

Are you going to

1. Simply call the infraction
2. Dust off the plate and tell F2 to talk to F1 and NEXT time it is a balk or
3. if you are BU tell any infielder to talk to F1.

I am interested in how "other" associations instruct their umpires on these "ticky/taky? type rules. Similar to the "old days" when in FED F1 could not check a runner. How many associations enforced that rule.

Thanks TEE

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2008, 01:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Twp

R1, F1, off the mound, goes to his mouth, without wiping off he grips the ball. He now can _____________.
__________________
GB
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2008, 01:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

Garth,

Request Time and ask for a new ball.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2008, 01:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM)
Garth,

Request Time and ask for a new ball.

JM
More TWP:

And, if he wipes off after gripping the ball and then takes the rubber?
__________________
GB
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2008, 02:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
More TWP:

And, if he wipes off after gripping the ball and then takes the rubber?
Same answer as above, i'm going to ask for the ball and replace it.

Thansk
David
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2008, 02:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

David,

In Garth's second sitch, you would, no doubt, add a ball to the batter's count as well, yes?

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 10, 2008, 01:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM)
David,

In Garth's second sitch, you would, no doubt, add a ball to the batter's count as well, yes?

JM
Probably not. (Only if a coach were to complain first)

No one would notice this but me and I would consider this looking for boogers.

I just consider that preventative umpiring.

(and yes I know what the rule book says ...)

Thanks
David
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2008, 01:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
[QUOTE=PeteBooth]
Quote:

TEE will you do some preventative umpiring on ths issue?

In other words you see F1 do this

Are you going to

1. Simply call the infraction
2. Dust off the plate and tell F2 to talk to F1 and NEXT time it is a balk or
3. if you are BU tell any infielder to talk to F1.

I am interested in how "other" associations instruct their umpires on these "ticky/taky? type rules. Similar to the "old days" when in FED F1 could not check a runner. How many associations enforced that rule.

Thanks TEE

Pete Booth
You know, if the coaches are dumb enough to lobby for this rule, it should be called. Everytime. Maybe then we can get rule 6 rewritten sensibly.

I have a modest proposal for a language change.

"FED Rule 6, see OBR Rule 7.00"
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Test questions, part 3 ChuckElias Basketball 16 Wed Sep 07, 2005 01:48am
Test questions, part 1 ChuckElias Basketball 12 Fri Sep 02, 2005 05:37am
Test Questions-NF devdog69 Volleyball 19 Wed Aug 24, 2005 01:07pm
Test questions SouthGARef Football 10 Fri Sep 17, 2004 09:50am
Questions from the test devdog69 Volleyball 14 Mon Oct 14, 2002 11:07am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1