Is the BIG Game worth it

[PeteBooth]

Hi all:

Amateur umpiring:

I believe most of us and least when we started umpiring had a goal of doing the BIG game be it a Regional / State HS Final or a College World Series Final.

What I have noticed is the following:

The higher you go the more intense the games are:

The question?

Do you ever ask yourself?

Self is it worth it?

Here's what I mean

I know some Varsity Officials that have asked to "go down" because they are simply fed up with the Varsity coaches. In basketball I know of several who do not want to move up. They prefer the modified game which is 5 quarters (at least in our area) and a continous clock. Hardly any-one in attendance and the game for the most part is a "no-brainer' meaning no intensity etc.

Since you are doing 5 quarters the FEE is roughly $15.00 less than a Varsity FEE but much less headaches.

Same is true for baseball officials. In my area there is a shortage so for the most part modified / Freshman games are done solo. You get a FEE plus 1/2. Therefore there is a roughly a $15.00 from the varsity Fee counting the extra FEE but just like basketball way less headaches.

In Summary have you ever felt that the BIG Game(s) are simply not worth it and I will stay with the less intense games and still earn a decent paycheck for my work.

Pete Booth

[TussAgee11]

This definitely happens, IMO. But its really no different then other facets of life that people wish to "move up" in. You get to the point where you are satisfied, and do not wish to be a climber anymore. Job, Girlfriend, Money... you name it.

As for going down the ladder? Again, it happens. But not as much as it should. Particularly with baseball and basketball, being a varsity official should not be a life time job. Even if you are able to stay in shape, there gets to a point where you have seen too much, dealt with too much, and have lost your ability to view the game completely unbiased (at least in the game management realm).

I think some officials realize this and then take a step down for the good of the game. Others just keep whining about it, and become a worse official year after year at the varsity level.

[bossman72]

It is definitely worth it. I'm a young official and a competitive guy. I treat my officiating like it's any other sport that I play- if you're not working to improve on last year with a 'never satisfied' attitude, then you should quit right there since you won't be worth a damn to your team. I feel the saying applies to both officiating and sports. You either get better or get worse- there is no third direction in my book (sports or officiating).

This may not be true for some others who 'just like being out there' and don't care if they have a bad game or not. They will probably take a lower level game instead of a varsity game so they can get the "easier money." I use playoff and 'big game' selection as one of the many barometers to see where I'm at. This is why I participate on these boards and what not- to get better and learn from great officials since I want to be the best official I can be.

This is different for some who are grizzled vets that have accomplished very much in their career. In this case, I say that if you are umpiring at a level in which you are ABLE to work a 'big game', but you CHOOSE TO give way to a newer rising official in the name of being a mentor and giving them the experience in big games, then I say that's fine since you are improving the quality of your chapter by doing this by getting the young guys experience. This is ok doing it a few times, but not so much as to totally compromise your schedule.

But to answer Pete's scenario of giving up Varsity games to do JV and younger games for possibly more pay and less intensity- I would never personally do this (at least in this stage in my career. Year #4 coming up). I want to be in the highest league that matches my skill level. If i'm good enough to work low level non conference varsity games, I will work as much of those as I can. If I can work a championship, I will definitely work that. If I'm only good enough to do 9th grade games, I will work those.

But the point I'm trying to make is- I'm not going to trade off a more competitive game just to make it "easier" on myself.

This would be like Tom Brady going and playing in the CFL since there isn't as much pressure as being on an 18-1 NFL team and it's a little easier on him, IMO.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by PeteBooth

Hi all:

Amateur umpiring:

I believe most of us and least when we started umpiring had a goal of doing the BIG game be it a Regional / State HS Final or a College World Series Final.

What I have noticed is the following:

The higher you go the more intense the games are:

The question?

Do you ever ask yourself?

Self is it worth it?

Here's what I mean

I know some Varsity Officials that have asked to "go down" because they are simply fed up with the Varsity coaches. In basketball I know of several who do not want to move up. They prefer the modified game which is 5 quarters (at least in our area) and a continous clock. Hardly any-one in attendance and the game for the most part is a "no-brainer' meaning no intensity etc.

Since you are doing 5 quarters the FEE is roughly $15.00 less than a Varsity FEE but much less headaches.

Same is true for baseball officials. In my area there is a shortage so for the most part modified / Freshman games are done solo. You get a FEE plus 1/2. Therefore there is a roughly a $15.00 from the varsity Fee counting the extra FEE but just like basketball way less headaches.

In Summary have you ever felt that the BIG Game(s) are simply not worth it and I will stay with the less intense games and still earn a decent paycheck for my work.

Pete Booth

Personally, no. I am bored silly working JV/Freshman baseball, which is why I've not done a single one in 3 years. And that one was as a last minute fill-in. I've not done a subvarsity basketball game in about that long, either. I would rather stay home.

Part of the joy for me is the atmosphere, but also the pressure and accountability.

EDITED to add: Nothing wrong with working lower level ball, but there are only so many days in April and May and I can work a varsity HS or college game just about every day those months. So why wouldn't I? And I do need a day off once in a while and rather that than working a freshman game with non-existent pitching.

[bob jenkins]

Pete --

IMO, Taking the lower level game over the higher level gme is one of the signs of someone who is "just in it for the money."

[JRutledge]

Call me what ever you like, but I cannot stand working lower level games. I love working the big games (in baseball that can be an oxymoron) or the game where something is on the line. Those are much more fun than working a game where the outcome means nothing. And in many cases I would rather travel and lose money to work that kind of game then stay in the back yard and work two terrible teams with nothing at stake.

Peace

[Rich]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Call me what ever you like, but I cannot stand working lower level games. I love working the big games (in baseball that can be an oxymoron) or the game where something is on the line. Those are much more fun than working a game where the outcome means nothing. And in many cases I would rather travel and lose money to work that kind of game then stay in the back yard and work two terrible teams with nothing at stake.

Peace

Why the knock on baseball, Jeff? There are just as many baseball games with something on the line as basketball. Is it the lack of a crowd and atmosphere that makes it seem less important? The slower pace?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

Why the knock on baseball, Jeff? There are just as many baseball games with something on the line as basketball. Is it the lack of a crowd and atmosphere that makes it seem less important? The slower pace?

The fewer people watching, the less the scrutiny.

You live in Big Ten country like I do. It is not about the nature of the sport or the pace. But do you really equate Big Ten Football with Big Ten Baseball?

Peace

[jicecone]

Generally, I repeat, Generally, I have found that the amount of controversy, abuse, bench jockeying and holy-then-god coach attitudes allowed during a contest are directly proprotional to your ability officiate your contests.

If you allow it in your games, it will come back to haunt you. Then you start second guessing yourself and everything your doing. Next thing you know, it becomes everyone elses fault, (coaches, parents, player, AD's, etc) execpt your own, and you are probably the cause of your failure but , don't want to admit it. It is easier to say I want the lower level games because of the coaches or players, than because I can't handle it.

I can respect the official that realizes the limits of their officiating ability and backs off the more competetive contests however, usually this is not the case though and many have higher expectations than their ability really is.

Personally, I have found that officiating a higher competitive game is easier because you can expect plays to be made because the skill level is higher. Therefore you can generally, excerise the correct mechanics to make the correct call and not worry AS MUCH about the unexpected. Pitchers are more around the strike zone and catchers make sure you see the strike zone, outs are more routine on ordinary plays and the game is played more in line with the rules because the teams and coaches are more knowledgable of rules. Of course there are exceptions to this, but for the most part it is true.

Except for the fact that I probably feel worst about making a mistake during a contest than the teams, I definetly enjoy the challange of knowing that a game was farly played because I officiated it, and the higher the level, the more the reward. And yes, I do enjoy receiving a good days pay for a good days work.

[RPatrino]

We just got our new game fee schedule at our 'all day' meeting on Saturday. Most leagues are paying $53 for Varsity/JV 2 man games. They are paying between $75-83 for ONE MAN JV/Freshman games. I'd be interested to see who asks for those games. I suppose if you dislike the intensity of varsity baseball you could opt to work down.

I've done a few 'big games' in my career, and yes, I do get off on the pressure. If you are scared you might have to punch out the batter for the final out of a one run championship game, then you should find another hobby.

Play-off baseball around here only pays $5 more then a regular season game, so no, it's not about the money. They do reserve a parking place for us though, but they don't pay for gas. Like I mentioned in an earlier post, I drove about 4 hours one way for one of my semi-final NCS games this past year. Trust me, it was well worth the drive.

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by RPatrino

We just got our new game fee schedule at our 'all day' meeting on Saturday. Most leagues are paying $53 for Varsity/JV 2 man games. They are paying between $75-83 for ONE MAN JV/Freshman games. I'd be interested to see who asks for those games. I suppose if you dislike the intensity of varsity baseball you could opt to work down.

Are you with the CCUA by chance?

I love working the big games, be it the atmosphere, the higher quality of ball or the greater challenge to my skills, I'm always trying to advance within my abilities.

The money is a nice secondary benefit.

[RPatrino]

Welpe, I work for NEB (North East Bay) as well as MCON (Mid County). I do know a great many of the guys that work with CCUA, though.

[Tim C]

Pete:

I cannot even recognize the issue that you are speaking of . . .

I want EVERY ONE of our umpires to strive to work the "biggest game." In my opinion any umpire that doesn't want the "Big Game" has started the downward slide to being nothing more than a "Warm Body" to fill assignment holes.

Not only do I want the "Big Game" I want the "BIG CALL".

Example:

Two years ago working a league playoff game we got to that final question:

3 Balls 2 Strikes Bases loaded and 2 out.

I was the base umpire located in "C" and (I thought) I was saying under my breath: "Hit it too me, hit it too me!" I wanted to make the final call (didn't matter "SAFE" or "OUT") just the "Big Call!"

Before F1 could get set to look for a sign F6 behind me called "TIME!"

He came to me laughing and said: "Are you saying 'hit it too me, hit it too me!'"

Sheepishly I nodded "yes" and he laughed:

Looking at me with a smile he said: "I was saying the same thing . . . I want to make the last play of the game."

Pete, I worked major college basketball for 20 years and I am starting my 40th year of baseball. Never once have I considered wanting to take games of lesser importance or level of play.

TussAgee11 wrote:

"As for going down the ladder? Again, it happens. But not as much as it should. Particularly with baseball and basketball, being a varsity official should not be a life time job. Even if you are able to stay in shape, there gets to a point where you have seen too much, dealt with too much, and have lost your ability to view the game completely unbiased (at least in the game management realm)."

This simply proves that children should be seen and not heard.

Regards

[bossman72]

Originally Posted by Tim C

I want EVERY ONE of our umpires to strive to work the "biggest game." In my opinion any umpire that doesn't want the "Big Game" has started the downward slide to being nothing more than a "Warm Body" to fill assignment holes.

Amen Tee! Exactly what my post was getting at. If we only had someone of your wisdom on the east cost... haha

[PeteBooth]

[QUOTE]

Originally Posted by Tim C

Pete:

I cannot even recognize the issue that you are speaking of . . .

Tee what I was trying to get at and perhaps I didn't make my OP clear is this.

You have done the BIG game made the BIG call etc. Also, it depends upon one's area, but are simply tired of dealing with High intense coaches.

In other words most every game has that high intense pressure.

It's not that an umpire is strictly out there for the money etc. but to coin a term "has done their time" and are simply tired of it.

This type of umpire still likes to umpire but simply does not want the aggravation anymore.

I believe this was a topic in one of the referee articles years back when the article was about a decline in Officiating. The article talked about many aspects of officiating and gave I believe the top 5 / 10 reasons for the decline.

Also, for the most part Officiating is not our prime source of income It is a hobby, so IMO you cannot compare one's workplace (trying to get ahead) with officiating. One 's workplace pays the bills whereas Officiating supplements one's income so you can pay for equipment and take a vacation.

Hopefully I clarified things

Pete Booth