The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 04:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Interested Ump
The Deej took one to the back of the head on the basepaths? I'll have to ask him about that. Could you cite fo me?

Not on the basepaths, it was working the dish with his back turned to the ball that caused Donovan to get plunked in the back of the head. He made no bones about letting us know this, along with mentioning he'd been hit "dozens" of times by batted balls while working the bases. Get him out to a clinic or two, Walter.


Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 06:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 325
"What if he runs into the umpire going after a batted ball?" SteponTyler asks?

I myself never go after batted balls when I umpire.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 06:42pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by LakeErieUmp
"What if he runs into the umpire going after a batted ball?" SteponTyler asks?

I myself never go after batted balls when I umpire.
In the sentence structure, "he" was the subject, so it was "he" that ran after the batted ball, not the umpire. Nice try though.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 09:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Sorry, Steve, but you're wrong. The phrase "going after a batted ball" modifies what immediately precedes it: in this case, "the umpire."
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 10:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
Sorry, Steve, but you're wrong. The phrase "going after a batted ball" modifies what immediately precedes it: in this case, "the umpire."
Exactly. What we have here is a misplaced gerund phrase. When discussing this with students I use the classic, "The soldiers snuck up on the enemy crawling on their bellies."
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 10:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
Exactly. What we have here is a misplaced gerund phrase. When discussing this with students I use the classic, "The soldiers snuck up on the enemy crawling on their bellies."
When dangling, don't use participles.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2007, 02:30am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
Exactly. What we have here is a misplaced gerund phrase. When discussing this with students I use the classic, "The soldiers snuck up on the enemy crawling on their bellies."
So, to make the sentence grammatically correct you could insert the word "while" between "umpire" and "going for a batted ball," correct?
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2007, 10:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
So, to make the sentence grammatically correct you could insert the word "while" between "umpire" and "going for a batted ball," correct?
No. You'd move the gerund phrase.

"What if he, while going after a batted ball, runs into the umpire?"
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Train Wreck, Malicious Contact, or Obstruction. Rattlehead Softball 22 Mon Jun 11, 2007 04:05pm
No-call train wreck? mplagrow Basketball 21 Sat Feb 11, 2006 09:36pm
Train wreck no call UW/Pacific zebraman Basketball 16 Tue Mar 22, 2005 09:24am
Train wreck gone? WestMichBlue Softball 13 Thu Feb 17, 2005 04:10pm
interference, obstruction or wreck? shipwreck Softball 13 Wed Feb 06, 2002 08:47pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1