The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 30, 2007, 12:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by David B
Just wondering if someone saw the first balk called on Giants pitcher last night. ESPN showed the second which was pretty obvious, but they didn't show the first one. On the web news, the Giants all didn't see the first one and questioned it.

Of course the umpire making the call Bob Davidson "balkin Bob".

Just wondering if it really was a balk as some of his calls are often questionable.

Thanks
David
The second balk was obvious and a "no brainer". In watching the game it seemed as if all the umpires were calling balk.

The first one i cannot figure out. Also, it seems as if ONLY Bob Davidson saw the balk because none of the other umpires "blinked"

As far as making a "gutsy" call IMO I do not think the last call was "gutsy" even though the game was on the line. I think most who saw the game called balk at almost the same time the umpires did. Every-one knew that Benitez balked.

I would not have called the first balk. Granted I didn't have my eyes GLUED to F1 but the balk was "petty" at best and IMO should not have been called.

The last one - No problem. The first one as the title of your thread indicates is Balkin Bob

BTW he had another call that went against LaDuca where he rang up a strike on a questionable check swing. So besides the balk Davidson also contributed in "other" ways.

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 30, 2007, 01:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 605
Ok...I'll admit it. Last night when I was watching while half asleep, I thought for sure Bob had the 1st balk call correct. I've watched it 10 times today at ESPN.com...and I just don't see a balk. That's my two cents.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 03:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 103
hi,
for me as a new umpire, its not that obvious, that flinching his shoulder has to be called a balk, if he is not in set position. could anybody of you explain me, why this has to be called a balk (not in set position) and which rule is enforced.

regards
bruno
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 06:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
First balk...started and stopped. Maybe more subtle than Froemming would call, but a violation nevertheless.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1