The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 11:29am
BigGuy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Nobody likes to see it called because most people only focus on the tag and not where the runner's foot is. I have similar calls every second or third game. When I see it, I point and say right away, "under the tag, under the tag". Sometimes I'll say "high tag" if the fielder has a chance to place the proper tag but does so very high that the runner is easily there.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 12:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,193
Not a baseball guy, but years ago in Referee mag, the editors responded to a coach's letter by supporting the idea of "ball beating the runner, call him out." This play seems to suggest that at the very least, this umpire doesn't go by that. Does anyone go by that, or is that philosophy a thing of the past?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 12:07pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie
Not a baseball guy, but years ago in Referee mag, the editors responded to a coach's letter by supporting the idea of "ball beating the runner, call him out." This play seems to suggest that at the very least, this umpire doesn't go by that. Does anyone go by that, or is that philosophy a thing of the past?
The philosophy exists as long as the fielder does what he's supposed to do. In other words, if F2 had laid his glove in front of the plate and R2 had *maybe* gotten a hand on the plate a microsecond before the actual tag, there'd be no debate here. But even in real time watching the game (I'm a Phillies fan), the runner was clearly safe, proving that Barajas is still a poor excuse for a Major League catcher.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 05:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 387
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Fronheiser
The philosophy exists as long as the fielder does what he's supposed to do. In other words, if F2 had laid his glove in front of the plate and R2 had *maybe* gotten a hand on the plate a microsecond before the actual tag, there'd be no debate here. But even in real time watching the game (I'm a Phillies fan), the runner was clearly safe, proving that Barajas is still a poor excuse for a Major League catcher.
Looks like Barajas expected a collision and set up for that by forgot to 'close the door' (Keeping legs spread), letting the runner slide under the tag.

As Rich says, poor play for a HS let alomne MLB catcher.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obstruction in Giants/Phillies game Toadman15241 Baseball 10 Tue May 08, 2007 07:47am
play at the plate coach2535 Baseball 32 Sun Mar 04, 2007 06:41pm
Cardinals - Marlins game, batter interference. Illini_Ref Baseball 57 Mon Aug 15, 2005 01:38am
Braves/Marlins Play Peruvian Baseball 7 Tue Jun 28, 2005 08:24am
Phillies & Braves, 7/11 mrm21711 Baseball 3 Mon Jul 12, 2004 10:11am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1