The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 02:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
Sigh.


J/R opines that once the pitch has been misplayed by F2, the batter is now an 'offensive teammate' for purposes of INT. Generally speaking, INT by an offensive teammate needs to be 'blatant and avoidable' to be called such. Now, this OP could still be called INT, I only state that the bar for such a call is higher for a misplayed pitch than a cleanly caught pitch. IMO, this higher standard very nearly must be intent, or 'blatant and avoidable' indifference.

Your cites do not address pitches that have passed F2, but rather pitches correctly handled by F2. Again, another reason why one often must go to other authoritative sources to resolve unusual situations.
And no, you probably won't find 'INT by offensive teammate', 'neighborhood play', or 'last time by' in the OBR ruleset, either.

Last edited by LMan; Thu May 24, 2007 at 02:50pm.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More questions BlitzkriegBob Volleyball 1 Mon Oct 02, 2006 02:02pm
Two Questions Duke Baseball 2 Sun Jun 04, 2006 12:02pm
Runner interference versus umpire interference Jay R Baseball 1 Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm
FED Questions Lapopez Baseball 3 Fri Apr 01, 2005 08:39am
Tax Questions BlitzkriegBob General / Off-Topic 4 Mon Feb 28, 2005 07:56am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1