Back in the day (before the discussion boards, before J/R, before JEA), how did most amatuer umpires learn of rules interpretations? Word of mouth, association training, clinics, etc.
For those experienced umpires, do you feel that access to the above mentioned resources would have sped up your learning curve? Do you feel that today's new umpire with two years of experience is better prepared than his 1970 or 1980 equivilant?
__________________
advocatus diaboli Somebody who criticizes or opposes something in order to provoke a discussion or argument.
|
Sun Dec 16, 2001, 06:09pm
Threaded Mode
