![]() |
|
|
|||
Controversial MLB Interference Call
Stay tune for a whacky 4th inning play in the Braves/Pirates game. Braves Chipper Jones ran/leaped over the Pirates' Jose Bautista just after Bautista fielded the ball on the baseline near 3B. The umpires ruled that the fielder has fielded the ball cleanly. As Bautista was clobbered, he went down to the ground and never raised his glove to tag out Jones. Chipper made no effort to run around F5, landed hard on top of the bag and was later ruled safe. The Pirates skipper managed to stay in the game after the call against the Pirates. WOW. Pirates scored in the following half-inning to take a 0-1 lead, but lost the game 4-1.
Edited to add a salute to Bobby Cox who tied {Sparky} Anderson for fourth in all-time managerial wins, 2,194th. Had trouble with the video link: http://mlb.mlb.com/media/player/mp_t...e=v_free&_mp=1 Last edited by SAump; Sat May 12, 2007 at 08:48am. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
GB |
|
|||
I saw the game also and the runner may not have intentionally interfered but he did interfere. He made contact with the fielder about 1/2 second after he fielded the ball. Then fell over him trying to get to third. As a result, the attempt to get the batter-runner at first was truly hindered. Intentional or not.
I thought that they would have called out the batter-runner. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Well, I don't have access to my books right now, but off the top of my head that is not a universally true statement. Interference with a fielder fielding a batted ball does not have to be intentional, true. Apparently, the umpire ruled the fielder had already fielded the ball. Intent does come into play with interference with a thrown ball. Would it also come into play with a fielder attempting to get set to throw a ball or make a play? When the called interference on A-Rod for slapping the fielder's arm, they made a point of calling it an intentional act. I believe that if the umpire had ruled the fielder was done fielding the correct call would be no interference on the the ensuing contact unless the umpire was convinced the the contact was intentional.
__________________
GB Last edited by GarthB; Sat May 12, 2007 at 01:17am. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interference call | benbret | Softball | 3 | Wed May 17, 2006 06:47pm |
The Controversial Center Circle | rainmaker | Basketball | 9 | Mon Jan 17, 2005 09:39am |
Controversial Umpire Calls in Red Sox Vs. NY | Gre144 | Baseball | 6 | Sat Oct 23, 2004 08:44am |
Controversial calls... | WindyCityBlue | General / Off-Topic | 35 | Mon Oct 11, 2004 01:16pm |
Interference or no call | tornado | Baseball | 4 | Tue Jul 15, 2003 04:38am |