The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 13, 2007, 01:28pm
Broadcaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LaGrange, Ga.
Posts: 364
Honoring Jackie Robinson

From the NY Times:

Sixty years after Jackie Robinson shook the baseball establishment and broke the sport’s color barrier, an unforeseen grassroots movement by today’s players has suddenly shaped the way Major League Baseball will commemorate the anniversary. More than 200 players will wear Robinson’s No. 42 retired by baseball 10 years ago in ballparks across the country on Sunday, the anniversary of Robinson’s first appearance with the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1947.

While the tribute has received baseball’s approval, it grew spontaneously from a request by the Cincinnati Reds’ Ken Griffey Jr., who asked Commissioner Bud Selig earlier this month if he could wear the number on April 15. What has evolved since is surprisingly organic for a group of famous, feted athletes with multimillion-dollar contracts.

As word of Griffey’s gesture spread, small groups of players — among them stars like Barry Bonds, Dontrelle Willis and Gary Sheffield — decided also to wear 42 that day. Soon, there was a representative from every team. The Los Angeles Dodgers then decided to have their entire roster wear 42.

Now, there are six major league teams that plan to have everyone in uniform wearing No. 42 — players, coaches, manager and bat boys. Those teams are the Dodgers, the St. Louis Cardinals, the Pittsburgh Pirates, the Philadelphia Phillies, the Milwaukee Brewers and the Houston Astros.

And the number of jerseys having a new 42 sewn onto the back remains fluid, but seems to be increasing by the day.

Baseball had planned events commemorating the 60th anniversary at every ballpark this year, even before the ad hoc initiative to wear Robinson’s number began. The plans were not as elaborate as those for the 50th anniversary, when President Bill Clinton and Rachel Robinson, Jackie Robinson’s widow, appeared in a ceremony in the middle of a game at Shea Stadium. But commemorations were scheduled in some cities, including Los Angeles and New York.

The Phillies are among the teams that will have the entire roster wearing No. 42. The team made the decision to do so after a players’ meeting last week.

No player on any team wearing a No. 42 will have a name on the jersey above the number.
The jerseys will be authenticated by Major League Baseball after Sunday’s games and most will be auctioned off for charity.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

I imagine substitutions would be tough for umpires and broadcasters alike. "42 in for 42."

Thoughts about honoring Robinson aside, what are your thoughts about the way some teams are going about it. Is having an entire roster of #42s without names on the back a good idea from an umpiring standpoint?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 13, 2007, 01:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
Quote:
Originally Posted by voiceoflg

Thoughts about honoring Robinson aside, what are your thoughts about the way some teams are going about it. Is having an entire roster of #42s without names on the back a good idea from an umpiring standpoint?
In the games we work it would be a little hard to police, but I'm sure MLB will do just fine with it.


Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 13, 2007, 02:07pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
I figure if the other teams want to jump on the PR bandwagon so be it...they'll make it work...most of the umpires know many of the players anyway...
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 13, 2007, 02:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: At the base of the mountains
Posts: 377
Once again Griffey shows more class then the average major leaguer. Now if he can just stay healthy.

As for difficulity on the field, I don't think they will have any problems for a day. Easy line up card... Skipper... that's 42 for 42 in the three hole correct... thanks
__________________
Its' not a matter of being right or wrong, it's a matter of working hard to get it right.

Last edited by justanotherblue; Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 02:20pm.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 13, 2007, 03:19pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,558
I bet there are instructions from the umpires on how to deal with this issue over all. I am sure there will not be any problems at all.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 20, 2007, 06:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
Equipment Costs

Back in my day, not Jackie's, a MLB baseball glove cost about $40, and NFL football cost about $40, and an NBA basketball cost about $100. It was much cheaper to throw the ball around in the yard than to find a basketball court or football field where we were allowed to run around and play.

Deion and Bo chose football over baseball. What was the name of that guy who chose baseball over football? Today, a good outdoor football cost about $24, a good outdoor basketball cost about $40, and a good baseball glove costs about $150. Anybody wondering why anyone would blame our society on the declining numbers of quality black baseball athletes?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 20, 2007, 11:41am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by voiceoflg
I imagine substitutions would be tough for umpires and broadcasters alike. "42 in for 42."

Thoughts about honoring Robinson aside, what are your thoughts about the way some teams are going about it. Is having an entire roster of #42s without names on the back a good idea from an umpiring standpoint?
In a MLB game, the umpires know who the players are. They report, and are listed, on the batting order card by name.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Robinson v. Wolf tmp44 Baseball 17 Sat Sep 03, 2005 11:40pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1