|
Mon Apr 09, 2007, 10:19am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Durham - in this case, "trainwreck" is a non-rulebook euphamism that we all understand.
In essence, it means that if this fielder has possession, you have nothing. Runner is not guilty of anything listed under the interference rule, and if the fielder has the ball, he's not guilty of anything listed under the obstruction rule. What's left? Play-on. (or "Nothing" or "Trainwreck")
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tricky call | Ump29 | Baseball | 12 | Fri Feb 09, 2007 08:15pm |
| Obstruction or interference | akalsey | Baseball | 6 | Mon Jun 21, 2004 08:00am |
| interference vs obstruction... | thumpferee | Baseball | 2 | Mon May 24, 2004 07:33am |
| Obstruction or Interference | sprivitor | Softball | 4 | Sat May 24, 2003 10:41am |
| Obstruction?, Interference? Nothing? | Gre144 | Baseball | 21 | Fri Jul 26, 2002 06:01am |
Threaded Mode
