The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 05, 2007, 01:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Fronheiser
And FED mechanics put the BU in C. It doesn't really matter.

Why would a PU ever think of covering a fly ball as going out?
1. He's working OBR based PONY, not FED.

2. How would you know FED mechanics? I thought you threw the umpire manual out when you received it?

3. Why a PU would even consider "going out"? Beats the hell out of me. The sad part is it appears that he is put in a position to teach the original poster, a first year umpire. Kudos to the poster for looking for a second opinion.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 05, 2007, 04:03pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
1. He's working OBR based PONY, not FED.

2. How would you know FED mechanics? I thought you threw the umpire manual out when you received it?

3. Why a PU would even consider "going out"? Beats the hell out of me. The sad part is it appears that he is put in a position to teach the original poster, a first year umpire. Kudos to the poster for looking for a second opinion.
I just knew that FED put the umpire in C. Actually, I kept this year's manual, thinking it may be the last ever. It appears I'll be able to say the same for my 2006 BRD as well.

B, C, it doesn't matter much with R1+R3. Would you actually change the side you stand on based on the rule set? I know I'm in B all the time in this setup.

I've seen umpires go out from the middle in 2-man. Amazing sight watching umpires randomly chase balls all over the outfield. In many areas of the country, the participants see that as "good hustle" instead of "idiotic umpiring."
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 05, 2007, 04:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by drh898
Had a situation the other day. I'm in C postion, men on 1st and 3rd. Short pop-up to left field, down the third base side. Believing the PU has the call I start I start looking for tag ups and watching runners in case ball drops safely. PU tells me between innings I blew it and it should have been my call. I still don't think it was, but what is your opinion? Should I forget runners and go out? BTW, shortstop makes diving catch just inside foul line.
Ask you learned elder who has fair/foul responsibility on the play he thought you had the catch/no catch call. Hopefully a lightbulb will illuminate in his head.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 05, 2007, 04:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Fronheiser
I just knew that FED put the umpire in C. Actually, I kept this year's manual, thinking it may be the last ever. It appears I'll be able to say the same for my 2006 BRD as well.

B, C, it doesn't matter much with R1+R3. Would you actually change the side you stand on based on the rule set? I know I'm in B all the time in this setup.

I've seen umpires go out from the middle in 2-man. Amazing sight watching umpires randomly chase balls all over the outfield. In many areas of the country, the participants see that as "good hustle" instead of "idiotic umpiring."
I wouldn't change for rule set. We use CCA for everything. I just mentioned the pro mechanics becuase I knew the poster was working PONY.

I've seen a lot of idiotic umpiring being sold as either "hustle" or "preventive umpiring." Funny thing is that some of what was described as preventive umpiring resulted in ejections. (NB:This is not to deny that there really is a time and place for real preventive umpiring.)

I don't know what happend to the 2007 BRD. Supply and demand issue? If Carl worked for the same editor I have, and didn't submit the 2007 edition, he'd have never heard the end of it.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 05, 2007, 05:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
Did you discuss this before the game? If this was discussed before the game, at least you know where your partner stood on this coverage. Now by all mechanics I have seen this is clearly the PU's call all the way. But when you discuss this in the pre-game before the game, then he cannot come back to you later and say you blew anything.

Peace
JR, with all due respect, what's to discuss? I'm not going to go over the entire 2-man mechanics manual with my partner when working a 2-man game. Because I work upper level games where my partners are expected to know what to do, I'm not going to have a mechanics clinic before the game. If they don't know and it's a game I assign, they're done with me. If it's one of my other college assignors, I'm sending said assignors a note telling them what happened.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 05, 2007, 06:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by drh898
Had a situation the other day. I'm in C postion, men on 1st and 3rd. Short pop-up to left field, down the third base side. Believing the PU has the call I start I start looking for tag ups and watching runners in case ball drops safely. PU tells me between innings I blew it and it should have been my call. I still don't think it was, but what is your opinion? Should I forget runners and go out? BTW, shortstop makes diving catch just inside foul line.
Even when it's "obvious" the umpires could / should communicate who is taking the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 05, 2007, 07:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Indeed. After all, isn't assumption the mother of all f-ups?
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 05, 2007, 07:31pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP25
JR, with all due respect, what's to discuss? I'm not going to go over the entire 2-man mechanics manual with my partner when working a 2-man game. Because I work upper level games where my partners are expected to know what to do, I'm not going to have a mechanics clinic before the game. If they don't know and it's a game I assign, they're done with me. If it's one of my other college assignors, I'm sending said assignors a note telling them what happened.
Why do you have to go over the entire manual? But you better go over some basics if you want to be on the same page. Not all umpires are on the same level of knowledge or are used to working with you or me who might do it right.

I also work some college ball and every umpire I work with at that level we go over things. It is not about knowing everything. It is about getting on the same page and not be surprised. Not everyone at the upper level has been there a long time or is taught the same things. I do not like to assume anything.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 05, 2007, 07:33pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
Even when it's "obvious" the umpires could / should communicate who is taking the ball.
Indeed. I always call out, "I got the ball" when I got the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 05, 2007, 09:07pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by drh898
Between innings should the BU stand in right field and not on the foul line by 1st base and up the line to avoid being hit by an errant throw?
If you stand in RF you will in F9's way. Find a spot in short RF, somewhere out behind F4's position in the outfield 20 or 30 feet. Where you stand is not critical though, as long as you are far enough out there that no coach would come that far to discuss anything with you that might have happened in the last half inning.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 05, 2007, 11:46pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
Why do you have to go over the entire manual? But you better go over some basics if you want to be on the same page. Not all umpires are on the same level of knowledge or are used to working with you or me who might do it right.

I also work some college ball and every umpire I work with at that level we go over things. It is not about knowing everything. It is about getting on the same page and not be surprised. Not everyone at the upper level has been there a long time or is taught the same things. I do not like to assume anything.

Peace
I don't cover things like this in a pregame. If a plate umpire doesn't know he has the left field line ALL THE TIME in a 2-umpire system, we have bigger problems than an inadequate pregame.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 05, 2007, 11:56pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Fronheiser
I don't cover things like this in a pregame. If a plate umpire doesn't know he has the left field line ALL THE TIME in a 2-umpire system, we have bigger problems than an inadequate pregame.
I cover the "V" and simply say when who has the ball in the "tweener" situation. Some guys like to signal or voice they have the ball. I just want to know what they expect and how we will handle it. I do not work with the same people all the time and work with people of various levels of experience. Not everyone is knowledgeable about mechanics and coverage.

I am talking about it here more than I have to do when working actual games.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Being "hung out to dry" PeteBooth Baseball 16 Sun Apr 08, 2007 08:38pm
Net Hung Up eckert Basketball 78 Mon Jan 08, 2007 06:53pm
Oklahoma T Tech hung net MN 3 Sport Ref Basketball 39 Fri Jan 23, 2004 08:22am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1