![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 |
|
|||
Quote:
for the PU to put it back into play. It cannot be a balk after a dead ball, because the ball cannot be made "live" again unless F1 has it in his possesion.
__________________
All generalizations are bad. - R.H. Grenier |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 |
|
|||
Sds:
I was careful to note that the ball went to DBT:
This means that an umpire cannot put the ball into paly without the ball being in F1's possesion. The play, as agreed to by e-mails to Evans, Roder and Yeast, is that the umpires errored in putting the ball in play and is, therefore, a "do over." Hope this helps. Regards, |
|
|||
Tibear the obstruction rule is covered very clearly in the Baseball Canada Intrepretations #4. In fact the ruling covers the exact question word by word.
http://66.241.210.162/files/Canadian...ule%20Book.doc |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
GB Last edited by bob jenkins; Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 09:10am. |
|
|||
Really? Because I found it quite descriptive and amusing myself. Perhaps I'm just a Peter Pan type personality, and remain forever young at heart.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 Last edited by bob jenkins; Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 09:11am. |
|
|||
Quote:
I'm not trying to excuse PWL's behavior. When you post crap like that, you sink, imo, to his level. It removes any reason you have to whine about his posts. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comparing Answers for 2006-2007 Exam | gordyscott | Basketball | 22 | Sun Oct 26, 2008 05:57pm |
2006 NF Mechinacs exam | umpire200 | Football | 4 | Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:07am |
2006 Nfhs Exam | silverstar1 | Volleyball | 6 | Wed Aug 30, 2006 01:41pm |
2006 Football Exam Part II | Rythem1007 | Football | 2 | Wed Aug 30, 2006 07:30am |
2006 CCA Exam on Refstripes.com | gscsj | Football | 0 | Wed May 17, 2006 11:32pm |