The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 31, 2006, 08:10pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C
the second baseman and pitcher try to do do a "hidden ball trick" -- as F1 steps on to the pitcher's plate and the umpire calls: "Play" the second baseman produces the ball and tags the runner.
Isn't this a balk, and not a "do over?"
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 31, 2006, 08:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Greater Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 611
Send a message via Yahoo to umpduck11
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Isn't this a balk, and not a "do over?"
Tee's sit implied a dead ball, by PU calling "Play". The ball has to be dead
for the PU to put it back into play. It cannot be a balk after a dead ball, because the ball cannot be made "live" again unless F1 has it in his possesion.
__________________
All generalizations are bad. - R.H. Grenier
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 31, 2006, 08:20pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpduck11
Tee's sit implied a dead ball, by PU calling "Play". The ball has to be dead
for the PU to put it back into play. It cannot be a balk after a dead ball, because the ball cannot be made "live" again unless F1 has it in his possesion.
Oh yeah, duh....it must be the sugar rush from all the Butterfingers.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 31, 2006, 08:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Sds:

I was careful to note that the ball went to DBT:

This means that an umpire cannot put the ball into paly without the ball being in F1's possesion.

The play, as agreed to by e-mails to Evans, Roder and Yeast, is that the umpires errored in putting the ball in play and is, therefore, a "do over."

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 31, 2006, 08:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 230
Tibear the obstruction rule is covered very clearly in the Baseball Canada Intrepretations #4. In fact the ruling covers the exact question word by word.

http://66.241.210.162/files/Canadian...ule%20Book.doc
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 02, 2006, 01:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
quoted post removed by bob jenkins
This ties for the most juvenile and sophomoric post on the internet.
__________________
GB

Last edited by bob jenkins; Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 09:10am.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 02, 2006, 01:34am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Really? Because I found it quite descriptive and amusing myself. Perhaps I'm just a Peter Pan type personality, and remain forever young at heart.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25

Last edited by bob jenkins; Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 09:11am.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 02, 2006, 09:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Really? Because I found it quite descriptive and amusing myself. Perhaps I'm just a Peter Pan type personality, and remain forever young at heart.
Steve --

I'm not trying to excuse PWL's behavior. When you post crap like that, you sink, imo, to his level. It removes any reason you have to whine about his posts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparing Answers for 2006-2007 Exam gordyscott Basketball 22 Sun Oct 26, 2008 05:57pm
2006 NF Mechinacs exam umpire200 Football 4 Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:07am
2006 Nfhs Exam silverstar1 Volleyball 6 Wed Aug 30, 2006 01:41pm
2006 Football Exam Part II Rythem1007 Football 2 Wed Aug 30, 2006 07:30am
2006 CCA Exam on Refstripes.com gscsj Football 0 Wed May 17, 2006 11:32pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1