The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 12, 2006, 08:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
MLB is different

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sal Giaco
I think Chris Hickman exactly understood my post. It's not the call, it's the way he handled the situation after the call. Wendlestedt acted like Leyland was coming out to argue balls & strikes. Unless the balk is obvious, managers/head coaches will generally come out to get an explanation.... if for nothing else, just to give his pitcher time to get himself back together.
Since Leyland already made his way out of the dugout, I was a little surprised at how aggressive Wendlestedt handled the situation (by not letting him to come out). Just an observation and opinion

Obviously Leyland understood and got all the info he needed. There is no need for a coach to argue or talk about a balk. I've always told F1 what he did and moved on.

A coach might ask what he did, but I'm not going to allow them to discuss it, there's nothing to discuss.

That's the way I"ve always handled it in my games college and HS. I'm sure there's even less to talk about at the MLB level.

Thanks
David
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 12, 2006, 03:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 91
I didn't suprise me that Hunter cut him off. Several years ago, I went to a Rockies game in Denver. Hunter was the PU. He pulled the old "let's talk about the lineup card" gag with Clint Hurdle during the half inning (Hunter approached Clint instead of the other way around). Clint didn't play along has he threw up his arms and said a couple of words. I could tell Hunter was probably telling him to shut up about something (lineup card routine) but I really didn't know what it was. Anyway, Hurdle shut up, stayed in the game and things went on...


Lawrence
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 12, 2006, 04:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
I noticed that Wendlestedt still uses the scissors stance (at least, I think that's what I saw). Old habits die hard, I guess.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 12, 2006, 04:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
I noticed that Wendlestedt still uses the scissors stance (at least, I think that's what I saw). Old habits die hard, I guess.
It's a pretty relaxed scissors that keeps his head considerably higher than most guys who work the scissors. It's almost more of an EXTREME heel-toe stance (with a foot or so between the heel and the toe).
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 12, 2006, 10:16pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
I noticed that Wendlestedt still uses the scissors stance (at least, I think that's what I saw). Old habits die hard, I guess.
You say this as if there is something wrong with the stance. I thought he looked pretty sharp in it. I used the same exact "more relaxed scissors" type stance from around '93 to '04, and really liked it alot. If I go back to doing HS Varsity again next year, I think I will re-visit that stance.

It puts much less strain on the back, legs, and neck area than does the traditional, more upright scissors.

I've heard this stance referred to as "the Tank" before by some pro school grads. I never thought that sounded so good, so I never adopted that description.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 13, 2006, 07:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
You say this as if there is something wrong with the stance.
Isn't there? As I understand it, MiLB has banned it, "relaxed" or otherwise. Do you suppose that was whimsy on their part? Arbitrary exercise of authority?

As for Wendelstedt's stance being "relaxed," I noticed that as well. For my part, a primary goal of a plate stance is to get my head in position to call the pitch. If the "relaxed" scissors raises my head (to eliminate neck strain), then it risks taking me out of position. Although I might be able to achieve some equilibrium point where my neck is not too strained and I'm not too out of position, this stance does not work for me.

Others, naturally, will do as they see fit.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 13, 2006, 10:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 476
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
Isn't there? As I understand it, MiLB has banned it, "relaxed" or otherwise. Do you suppose that was whimsy on their part? Arbitrary exercise of authority?
IIRC, it was because their insurance company was pissed there were so many back/neck injuries because of it. Although I would think later on they will have quite a few knee claims from the box.
__________________
Throwing people out of a game is like riding a bike- once you get the hang of it, it can be a lot of fun.- Ron Luciano
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 13, 2006, 11:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattmets
IIRC, it was because their insurance company was pissed there were so many back/neck injuries because of it. Although I would think later on they will have quite a few knee claims from the box.
Given the long history of the "box" and stances similar, and the fact that more MLB umpires have employed that stance than the scissors, if it caused near as many problems as the scissors, you'd have heard about it before now.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 13, 2006, 01:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 304
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
....I've heard this stance referred to as "the Tank" before by some pro school grads.
I think you mean the "taint" - It taint the box and it taint the scissors. It's some variation (sp) of the two mixed together.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 13, 2006, 02:14pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sal Giaco
I think you mean the "taint" - It taint the box and it taint the scissors. It's some variation (sp) of the two mixed together.
Yeah, I thought that might have been what they were saying, but I wasn't sure. I can't get my body into a traditional scissors because my back won't do that reverse "C" thing like the early Johnny Miller. This is my version:
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 13, 2006, 04:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sal Giaco
I think you mean the "taint" - It taint the box and it taint the scissors. It's some variation (sp) of the two mixed together.

heh heh heh heh...He said "taint."
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 14, 2006, 08:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
Fox lets Lyons go

Not sure if anyone was aware of the incident during Game 3. Here are the details.

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slu...v=ap&type=lgns

Thought Detroit fans would pause.

Last edited by SAump; Sat Oct 14, 2006 at 08:13pm.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 13, 2006, 02:24pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by PWL
The way Hunter was hiding behind the catcher they should call it "The Wuss".
I've seen a lot of MLB umpires hiding behind the catcher lately, in any kind of stance (except Wally Bell's kneeling). The catcher moves for an outside pitch, there they go moving out there with him and hiding.

If I was getting the money they are, I'd be proudly set up in the slot, totally exposed and willing to take the shot. Besides, they are sitting behind professional catchers. These guys don't let the ball hit the umpire very often. Man, I'd be in the scissors and never flinch once if I had that luxury.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1